Kroger Co. Announces Closure of Three LA Stores After ‘Hero Pay’ Ordinance

March 10, 2021 Updated: March 10, 2021

LOS ANGELES—The Kroger Co. announced March 10 that it’s closing three Los Angeles stores following the city council’s vote to approve an ordinance that requires large grocery and pharmacy retailers to offer employees an additional $5 per hour in hazard pay amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

A Food 4 Less at 5420 W. Sunset Blvd., and two Ralphs, one at 9616 W. Pico Blvd. and the other at 3300 W. Slauson Ave., will close on May 15, Kroger said.

The Cincinnati-based company has already drawn criticism after announcing on Feb. 1 that it will close a Ralphs and a Food 4 Less in Long Beach following that city’s $4 hazard pay ordinance. Those stores are set to close on April 17.

Los Angeles City Council members approved their ordinance March 3 on a 14–1 vote, with Councilmember John Lee as the only dissenter.

The $5 hazard pay is required for all non-managerial employees at grocery or drug retail stores with more than 300 employees nationwide, or more than 10 employees on-site, as well as retail stores, such as Walmart and Target, that dedicate 10 percent of their sales floor to groceries or drug retail.

The hazard pay is given in addition to employees’ base wages for 120 days. According to a report by Los Angeles’ chief legislative analyst, which cited ZipRecruiter, the average grocery store worker in Los Angeles earns $17.51 an hour. Kroger said March 10 that the average Los Angeles Ralphs and Food 4 Less employee rate is $18 an hour.

Kroger said in a statement March 10 that the three stores it plans to close are “underperforming.”

“It’s never our desire to close a store, but when you factor in the increased costs of operating during COVID-19, consistent financial losses at these three locations, and an extra pay mandate that will cost nearly $20 million over the next 120 days, it becomes impossible to operate these three stores,” a Kroger spokesperson said.

Several Los Angeles City Council members cited moral reasons for extra compensation to grocery store frontline workers and criticized companies that threatened to close stores due to hero pay ordinances.

“Fair compensation is the very least that our grocery store workers deserve after all they have done for us,” Council President Nury Martinez, who introduced the original motion with Councilman Mitch O’Farrell, said during the council’s discussion of the ordinance on Feb. 24.

“Cashiers, stockers, baggers and so many more have risked their lives every day since March making minimum wage to make sure we have everything we need to stay safely at home to get through this crisis,” she said. “While these companies have seen massive profits, it has not trickled down to their employees. These companies can afford to pay the hazard pay, they just don’t want to.”

Councilmember Paul Koretz said: “Supermarkets, as we all know, have made high profits, and yet some are threatening to close. It’s clearly out of spite or out of an attempt to leverage us.”

Kroger claimed on March 10 that grocery stores operate “on razor-thin profit margins.”

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors adopted an urgency ordinance on Feb. 23 to require $5 additional pay for national grocery and drug retail employers in unincorporated areas of the county.

The California Grocers Association filed federal lawsuits against Long Beach, West Hollywood, and Montebello, seeking to declare hazard pay mandated by those cities as invalid and unconstitutional, contending that grocers will not be able to absorb the additional pay without raising prices, closing stores, reducing hours, or laying off employees. A federal judge denied the association’s bid to temporarily overturn the Long Beach ordinance.

Los Angeles’s chief legislative analyst determined that potential economic impacts of the ordinance include temporary increases of labor costs as a percentage of the company’s sales; potential higher prices for consumers; potentially delayed store openings, renovations, and wage increases or promotions for employees; potential pressure on struggling stores that could lead to stores closing; and reduced hours for some employees.

However, the CLA also determined that the higher wages could benefit other city businesses, as more people would have extra money to buy additional goods. It could also help people pay down their debts and increase their savings.

“As the CLA report makes clear, this ordinance comes with trade-offs for both retailers and employees, pros and cons with anything we do, but it should be appreciated that this effort is a temporary measure that increases wages of our grocery and retail workers,” Councilman Mark Ridley-Thomas said before the measure’s first reading on Feb. 24. “I want to underscore that it is a matter of justice.”

John Grant, president of United Food and Commercial Workers Local 770, which represents 25,000 grocery and drug retail workers in Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo counties, praised the vote.

“We applaud the Los Angeles city council members for doing the right thing and recognize the sacrifices our members do every day to serve their communities during a prolonged global pandemic. It’s unconscionable to see how grocery corporations have doubled their profits during the pandemic—with Ralphs and Albertsons alone raking in $6.8 billion in profits—while they still refuse to compensate the front-line workers making this windfall possible,” Grant said.

Lee, the lone dissenter, said he hoped the council could come up with a different solution than what he called “a gross overreach of government into business and what they should be paying their employees.”

“At the end, I don’t want to affect the people who are going to be hurt the most by this, and that is the people who live in the poorest communities of the city of Los Angeles, the people who live in my district.”