An official from the Justice Department confirmed reports that the agency is looking into filing federal charges against the man who killed Kate Steinle in the summer two years ago. The official declined to give more information.
Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, a Mexican man who is an illegal alien in the United States, was acquitted of Steinle’s murder and manslaughter on Thursday, Nov. 30. He was convicted on a lesser charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm.
“We will prosecute this to the fullest extent available in the law,” she said.
Zarate has been deported five times and had a rap sheet of multiple crimes, including drug crimes, Flores told Fox News, adding that he knew about San Francisco’s sanctuary status—the city’s policy to severely constrain its cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
Steinle died from a lower back wound after the round pierced her heart.
Prosecutors argued Zarate aimed and fired at Steinle intentionally.
“This is a person who should not have been in San Francisco to begin with,” Flores said. “Kate Steinle should still be alive today.”
Zarate’s acquittal has initiated yet another debate. While his defense presented multiple pieces of evidence that the shooting was accidental (and not a first- or second-degree murder), Zarate also faced an involuntary manslaughter charge.
In this case, could the prosecutors argue Zarate’s killing of Steinle resulted from an unlawful act of his illegal possession of a firearm?
“It sure seems to me that there was a good argument for manslaughter here,” said Ken White, former Assistant United States Attorney and co-founder of the blog Popehat, on Twitter.
However, he said that the prosecutors may have intentionally left the manslaughter charge out of their arguments.
“The reason is strategic. Prosecutors often choose the level of offense they want and argue hard for that and de-emphasize the arguments for the other levels out of concern that a jury will convict of a lesser included because it’s simpler to decide,” he wrote.
“So it would not surprise me at all if the prosecutor didn’t really forcefully and in detail make the ‘even if it was accidental it was manslaughter’ argument, out of fear it would encourage the jury to choose that instead of murder.”
If that is the case, the jury “may not get” why the lesser charge applies, he said.
Friends Read Free