Impeachment Inquiry Comments

Impeachment Inquiry Comments
In this image from video, Senators vote on the first article of impeachment during the impeachment trial against President Donald Trump in the Senate at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, Feb. 5, 2020. (Senate Television via AP)
The Reader's Turn
11/18/2019
Updated:
7/10/2020

I’m satisfied that anyone minimally educated and in their right mind can see by now that the Democrat’s impeachment inquiry circus is very much ado about absolutely nothing. However, I would like to draw attention to the eerie parallels between the latest “charges” and the Dem’s own dirty laundry.

The inquiry focuses on the president’s phone call with a foreign leader, in which he supposedly withheld aid from that country until the foreign leader conformed to his wishes, which were supposedly not in the best interest of the United States, but only Trump personally, supposedly.

Sound familiar? Well, it sounds to me an awful lot like the vice president talking to a foreign leader (coincidentally from the same country), and withholding aid ($1 billion) unless that foreign leader conforms to his wishes, in this case by firing the prosecutor who was investigating his son.

If that doesn’t ring a bell, then to quote Joe Biden, “I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a [expletive]. He got fired.”

So making the sound assumption that Trump’s impeachment will come to nothing, what is the point? Well, the best defense is a good offense. The more we hear about Trump and Ukraine, the less we hear about Biden and Ukraine. And we hear nothing at all about Clinton. It makes sense to me.

David