LOS ANGELES—Former film producer Harvey Weinstein was convicted on Dec. 19 of sexually assaulting a woman in the Los Angeles area in 2013, but jurors acquitted him of charges relating to a second alleged victim and were unable to reach verdicts on charges relating to two other women.
Weinstein, 70, was convicted of three of the seven counts he was facing—forcible rape, forcible oral copulation, and sexual penetration by a foreign object. All three of those counts related to a victim referred to only as Jane Doe #1, with the crimes occurring on or about Feb. 18, 2013.
The eight-man, four-woman jury acquitted him of a felony charge of sexual battery by restraint involving an alleged attack on another woman—Jane Doe #3—in 2010. The panel was also unable to reach verdicts on charges of sexual battery by restraint involving an alleged attack in February 2013 against Jane Doe #2 and counts of forcible oral copulation and forcible rape involving an alleged attack against Jane Doe #4 in 2005.
Jane Doe #4 was publicly identified by her attorney as Jennifer Siebel Newsom, the wife of California Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lisa Lench declared a mistrial on the counts on which the jury couldn’t reach a verdict. Jurors indicated that they were split in favor of conviction on those counts.
Attorneys are due back in court on Dec. 20 to deliver arguments on aggravating factors in the case. Weinstein faces up to 18 years in prison for the counts on which he was convicted, although aggravating factors could lift that total to 24 years.
Jurors deliberated for roughly 41 hours over 10 sessions, twice hearing read-backs of testimony from the trial—most recently on Dec. 19. The jury was originally handed the case on Dec. 2, and it submitted at least one question to the judge during its deliberations, although the contents of the query weren’t revealed.
Prosecutors argued during the trial that Weinstein used his position as one of Hollywood’s most successful movie producers to gain access to and sexually assault women.
Deputy District Attorney Paul Thompson told jurors at the start of the case that Weinstein and his brother, Bob Weinstein, created Miramax Films, which produced a number of “iconic and award-winning films,” including “Pulp Fiction,” “The English Patient,” “Good Will Hunting,” and “Shakespeare In Love,” among others. The movies launched the careers of Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Quentin Tarantino, Thompson said.
Weinstein won an Oscar as a producer of the best-picture winner “Shakespeare in Love.”
Weinstein—who Deputy District Attorney Marlene Martinez had earlier called a “titan of the film industry”—engaged in “despicable behavior” and made sure that the alleged victims knew that he “could destroy them,” the prosecutor said in her closing argument. Martinez told jurors that Weinstein used his power to prey on and silence women. She called him a “predator” and said none of the women making accusations against Weinstein knew each other.
But defense attorney Alan Jackson told the jury that the entirety of the prosecution’s case could be summed up with five words—“Take my word for it”—and that the alleged victims lied on the stand about what was actually “consensual” or “transactional” sex with the now-disgraced filmmaker.
“Did one person come in here and say, ‘I said no to Harvey Weinstein and he screwed my career?’ Was there one? ... Not one person said that because it’s a fable ... It just isn’t true,” Jackson said.
The producer didn’t testify in his own defense.
During the trial, Jennifer Siebel Newsom—a documentary filmmaker—told jurors that she still lives with the trauma of being raped and sexually assaulted by Weinstein in his suite at The Peninsula Beverly Hills hotel in September 2005.
Weinstein, 70, was previously convicted in New York of raping an aspiring actress and of a criminal sex act against a former production assistant. That state’s highest court has since agreed to hear his appeal involving that case.
Friends Read Free