As nearly every school in the United State has converted all academic activities online, Harvard University is telling professors that they should trust that their students won’t cheat on their exams when in-person proctoring is no longer available.
The guide also asks professors to “trust and collaborate with your students” and advises them to rely on Harvard’s Honor Code for a closed-book exam.
“In my experience, the vast majority of students at Harvard demonstrate very high levels of academic integrity,” economic professor Robert N. Stavins told Harvard Crimson. “Making the exam closed-book at remote settings, without opportunities for monitoring and enforcement, could lead to inequities among students.”
Economics professor Christopher Foote also moved to open-book tests, citing “technical challenges” of asking his approximately 240 students to install anti-cheating software on their computers.
“Aside from the technical challenges of making sure that that software ran for everybody on their home computers no matter where they are, I just didn’t think it was appropriate to sort of introduce that level of intrusion of technological intrusion into the test taking process,” Foote told Harvard Crimson, adding that he chose to rely on Harvard’s Honor Code in trusting students not to consult with others about their exam answers.
Meanwhile, some professors insisted on proctoring their online exams. Government professor Stephen Chaudoin said that his teaching team successfully monitored an online, closed-book exam using web cameras, as suggested by the OUE protocol.
“In International Relations, when people talk about arms control, they sometimes say ‘Trust but verify,’” said Chaudoin. “The same applies here. We have to trust the students, and the online exam tools give us a partial way to monitor things.”