Exploring NYC’s Proposed Large Sugary Drink Ban

July 19, 2012 Updated: October 1, 2015
Epoch Times Photo
Louis Aronne, clinical professor of medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College, speaks at a journalists' lunch on July 19 about the proposed large sugary drink ban. (Zachary Stieber/The Epoch Times)

NEW YORK—Three experts with Cornell University examined the proposed ban on sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces Thursday, preceding the close of the public comment period.

In May, Mayor Michael Bloomberg proposed the ban in city eateries, theaters, and sports venues. A public hearing will be held in Long Island City next Tuesday, July 24, and the Board of Health is expected to vote on the proposal in September. If approved, the ban could take effect in March 2013.

Over the years, serving sizes for food and drinks have become larger and larger.

For example, the original Coca-Cola was 6.7 ounces. Now there is a 64 ounce “double gulp” cup size, which is almost 2 liters, and some stores may sell even larger sizes. At the same time, obesity has become known as an epidemic. This has led to higher health care costs and prompted different levels of government to attempt to tackle the issue in one way or another.

Bloomberg’s proposed ban is one of those ways. The ban targets numerous types of drinks that contain little or no nutrients. Critics have argued that limiting people’s freedom to choose what quantities they consume is not the government’s role, and the link between sugary drinks and obesity is tenuous.

New Yorkers for Beverage Choices, a group that includes beverage distributors and theater owners, opposes Bloomberg’s proposed ban. They say sugar-sweetened beverages like soda, juice drinks, sports drinks, and teas account for only 7 percent of the calories in the average American diet. The group advocated looking instead at “the bigger picture,” including education, diet, and exercise.

“A gimmick like this is not the solution,” said Eliot Hoff, the group’s spokesman, adding that the mayor and the city’s Department of Health (DOH) should focus on its positive initiatives, such as providing more access to healthy food.

Eric Moor from Staten Island drinks an Extreme Gulp from 7-Eleven filled with Gatorade to protest Mayor Bloomberg's soda ban in Manhattan. (Benjamin Chasteen/The Epoch Times)
Eric Moor from Staten Island drinks an Extreme Gulp from 7-Eleven filled with Gatorade to protest Mayor Bloomberg's soda ban in Manhattan. (Benjamin Chasteen/The Epoch Times)

The DOH cited four studies in a presentation that linked the intake of sugar-sweetened beverages to obesity and diseases, such as diabetes and heart disease. With more than half of adults—and nearly 40 percent of public students—in New York City obese or overweight, DOH said obesity causes 5,800 deaths every year and $4 billion in direct medical costs in the city.

Limiting sweetened beverages is not a treatment for obesity, but it does prevent weight gain, said Dr. Louis Aronne, clinical professor of medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College. Aronne relayed an experience during the past week that shocked him: Four teenagers, ages 18 and 19, were diagnosed with adult diabetes at the Comprehensive Weight Control Program, which he directs in partnership with New York Presbyterian.

“We’re talking about things that have never been seen in the history of the world,” said Aronne. “It makes us realize something really bad is going on.”

Epoch Times Photo
A line of drink cups ranging from 7 ounces to 64 ounces with their corresponding sugar content, on May 31, when Mayor Michael Bloomberg first announced his large sugary drink ban proposal. (Christian Watjen/The Epoch Times)

Drinking sugary beverages goes against dietary guidelines, according to Carol Parker-Duncanson, nutrition and health program leader for Cornell University Cooperative Extension
of New York City.

“We talk about portions, how to reduce intake of sweetened beverages—Don’t even buy it, do not bring it into the home,” Parker-Duncanson said.

One nutritional concern is that drinking sweetened beverages displaces healthier choices, such as 100 percent juice, low-fat milk, and water.

Aronne pointed out drink sizes at movie theaters begin at 32 ounces, so the consumer cannot choose a smaller size. The financial incentive to upgrade—larger sizes are usually only a mere $1 or less more than the smaller sizes—can be seen at restaurants as well.

Establishing rules for labeling sizes—such as not allowing a 32 ounce drink to be called “small”—could be a potential alternative to a ban, said David Just, behavioral economist at Cornell’s Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management. He said one study found that people ate 75 percent of a meal when it was labeled “extra large,” but people ate 95 percent when the same portion was labeled “regular.”

While alternatives exist, research should be done before any new rules get put into place, Just said.

“It’s got to be more than just ‘I think this will do the right thing, so let’s put it out there,'” Just said.

The Epoch Times publishes in 35 countries and in 19 languages. Subscribe to our e-newsletter.


Follow Zachary on Twitter: @zackstieber
Follow Zachary on Parler: @zackstieber