Evacuate Afghanistan Through Aggressive Action

Here's an outline of a plan that can work
August 23, 2021 Updated: August 24, 2021

Commentary

The Digital Dunkirk, which was organized at first by U.S. military veterans, has been helping people make it to the Kabul airport by helping them maneuver around fixed and mobile Taliban guards and sentries. They do this with satellite imagery and keeping a constant watch on an evolving situation.

Even with this help, making it through the final gauntlet is challenging—in many cases not possible.

One wonders why the Pentagon didn’t provide this kind of intelligence to U.S., allied, and Afghan friends whose lives are in great danger. The lack of Defense Department initiative is only understandable in the context of egregiously poor planning.

It isn’t that our troops on the ground are doing badly—they are heroes—but it’s clear there is much more we could have done, such as going out and collecting those who need to evacuate and convoying them to the Kabul airport.

The Pentagon could also have taken back Bagram Airfield, which it left in the middle of the night well before the Taliban surge got headway. The abandonment of Bagram, leaving the Afghans there uninformed, with electricity turned off, and equipment abandoned, is a black mark on the Defense Department and, specifically on CENTCOM, which ordered the escape from Bagram. (CENTCOM, or Central Command, is in charge of the abandonment of Afghanistan.)

Bagram performed an important surveillance role, which can be restarted. Surveillance aircraft along with C-130 gunships should be brought back in.

Bagram would have provided another, more secure alternative to Kabul. It can easily handle the largest transports, including the massive C-5 and the Ukrainian Antonov-225 which could take more than 1,000 people at a clip. The An-225 has been used for years to deliver U.S. and allied military supplies to Afghanistan, including heavy equipment.

Taking back Bagram would send the Taliban a stiff message and put them on notice that if they keep up the stranglehold on people who want to leave, we may stay as long as we want. This should encourage them, if that’s possible, to be more reasonable, as right now they are saying no to extending the exit deadline of Aug. 31.

To the degree possible, the United States should reconstitute some Afghan forces clustered in and around Bagram.

Unfortunately, the Pentagon is now saying it won’t retake Bagram. This is a cardinal mistake that fits into the jigsaw of other mistakes and blunders that are costing far too many lives and ruining the reputation of the United States.

The lack of creativity and bad leadership combine to create a nightmare.

If President Joe Biden wants to turn it around, he must significantly increase the firepower in the theater, especially at Kabul, bring back air firepower, particularly the A-10, which means that Bagram has to be recaptured.

The Army and Marines deployed there need vehicles (that can be flown in on C-5s) and firepower in the form of truck-mounted weapons. If possible, armored personnel carriers should either be brought in or liberated. They are needed as convoy escorts.

There is great concern in Kabul about Taliban, ISIS, and al-Qaeda suicide bombers, especially around the large crowds surging at the airport. Overhead surveillance could help find the bombers before they kill many Afghans, Americans, and others.

You can’t save Americans, our allies, and friends without adopting an aggressive approach. The idea that we can protect Kabul airport and move the refugees under the gun is a complete non-starter.

The reason we have Special Forces, who are great commandos, is to do a job like this. Bottling up these forces inside barbed wire fences is a waste of capability and dangerous, too, because Special Forces need mobility and maneuver room, not a stockade, to be useful and effective.

The lack of aggressive thinking and pre-planning is very troubling. A first-rate leader would know what to do and let the president know what has to be done.

One would have hoped the Joint Chiefs of Staff would do something. But these four-star generals and admirals are in hiding, only carping that they told the president this could be difficult and then went back into hiding, only to hear the president say he never heard any such thing.

We are about at the last chance for the survival of many people who we put under our wings and in our service. It’s clearly past time to get smart.

Hats off to the Digital Dunkirk warriors. But we need more, we need it now, and we need to learn to be tough again.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Stephen Bryen
Stephen Bryen
Dr. Stephen Bryen is regarded as a thought leader on technology security policy, twice being awarded the Defense Department’s highest civilian honor, the Distinguished Public Service Medal. His most recent book is “Technology Security and National Power: Winners and Losers.”