Prakazrel “Pras” Michel, a rapper and founding member of the 1990s hip-hop group Fugees, was sentenced to 14 years in prison on Nov. 20 for conspiring to help a foreign national launder millions of dollars in illegitimate campaign contributions into the 2012 U.S. presidential election.
Michel, 53, was sentenced in a Washington, D.C., courtroom on Thursday, after being convicted in April 2023 on 10 counts related to an illegal lobbying and money laundering scheme that was part of a wider foreign influence conspiracy involving Malaysian financier Jho Low.
In 2019, Michel and Low were charged with funneling millions of dollars of the latter’s money into former President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign.
According to the indictment, between June 2012 and November 2012, the Malaysian businessman had $21.6 million transferred to Michel, who then paid out approximately $865,000 of the money to more than a dozen straw donors to contribute to Obama’s joint fundraising committee.
“As proven at trial, the defendant engaged in an extensive conspiracy to use millions of dollars in foreign funds to engage in illegal back-channel lobbying and make unlawful campaign contributions,” Kenneth A. Polite, Jr., the then-assistant attorney general of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, also shared at the time. “Today’s verdict demonstrates that anyone who engages in unlawful foreign-sponsored efforts to influence American officials, our elections, or the criminal justice system will be brought to justice.”
“For his willingness to elevate foreign interests over those of the United States, Michel obtained more than $120 million from the architect of 1MDB, Low Taek Jho. After Michel was caught, he tampered with witnesses and then perjured himself at trial,” they wrote. “His sentence should reflect the breadth and depth of his crimes, his indifference to the risks to his country, and the magnitude of his greed.”
Michel’s attorney, Peter Zeidenberg, told The Epoch Times on Friday that the verdict was “unsupported by the evidence.”
“[T]he sentence is completely disproportional to the facts alleged, particularly when compared to his co-defendants, all of whom were intimately involved in the same alleged scheme,” Zeidenberg added. “There simply is no justification for Mr. Michel being singled out like this except for the penalty for opting for trial. We will appeal.”







