Creating an Icon: How the Sydney Harbor Bridge Could Have Looked

Creating an Icon: How the Sydney Harbor Bridge Could Have Looked
The Sydney Harbour Bridge in Sydney, Australia, Feb. 20, 2007. (Ian Waldie/Getty Images)
Daniel Y. Teng
6/20/2022
Updated:
6/27/2022

Many of us know about the Sydney Harbour Bridge, a breathtaking global icon that looms over one of the world’s finest harbours and has adorned countless postcards over the years.

Spanning 503 metres and rising to 134 metres above the water, the bridge took eight years to build and officially opened in 1932.

Today it serves as a vital artery connecting the north and south parts of Sydney. Residents using the bridge—whether they’re walking, cycling, driving, or taking public transport—are treated to spectacular views of Sydney Harbour and the Opera House.

It is hard to imagine any other design, but Australian authorities and engineer John Bradfield considered 70 proposals before settling on the now-familiar steel arch—which was inspired by New York City’s Hell Gate Bridge.

A couple visit a tourist area overlooking the Harbour Bridge in Sydney, Australia on June 28, 2021. (Saeed Khan/AFP via Getty Images)
A couple visit a tourist area overlooking the Harbour Bridge in Sydney, Australia on June 28, 2021. (Saeed Khan/AFP via Getty Images)

Motivated to recreate “stories of the past or present,” local 3D animation studio Arterra Interactive obtained the original design drawings of seven alternative bridge proposals from the New South Wales State Archives.

The team then devoted 800 production hours, using over 200 plugins, to piece together and recreate the cityscape from the ground up—offering a glimpse into what Sydney could have looked like.

Dorman Long and Co Project

The team at Dorman Long and Co submitted seven tenders for the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. This design involved a cantilever bridge with a span of 490 metres (1,600 feet) and made use of precast concrete blocks.
A cantilever bridge design was submitted by Dorman Long and Co Project to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)
A cantilever bridge design was submitted by Dorman Long and Co Project to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)

Norman Selfe—Steel Cantilever Bridge

Norman Selfe was an engineer and architect. This design almost made the cut and was praised for its structural lines and graceful design.
A steel cantilever bridge design was submitted by Norman Selfe to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)
A steel cantilever bridge design was submitted by Norman Selfe to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)

Norman Selfe—Triple Arch Bridge

Another design from Selfe. Instead of one arch, it had three. The design actually won over New South Wales authorities, but an economic downturn and change of government saw it consigned to history. The suburb of Normanhurst would later be named after Selfe in recognition of his work.
The triple arch bridge design was submitted by Norman Selfe to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)
The triple arch bridge design was submitted by Norman Selfe to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)

Francis Ernest Stowe’s 1922 Design

This imposing design was the most radical and involved a three-way structure connecting Balmain, Millers Point, and Balls Head with a 500-foot cathedral-like tower in the middle on Goat Island. The central tower would double as a war memorial with the island being renamed, Anzac Isle.
This three-way bridge design was submitted by Francis Ernest Stowe to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)
This three-way bridge design was submitted by Francis Ernest Stowe to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)

Cars would drive from each of the three points and enter the central intersection before driving out the other side. Each arm of the bridge would have featured large pylons similar to that of the Brooklyn Bridge in New York City.

However, there were questions over how well the design could handle high traffic flow.

This three-way bridge design was submitted by Francis Ernest Stowe to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)
This three-way bridge design was submitted by Francis Ernest Stowe to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)

McClintic Marshall

This American company was also involved in the construction of the George Washington Bridge and Golden Gate Bridge. The company submitted five designs incorporating cantilever, suspension, and arch bridges. This design did not make the final cut because the judges felt it did not harmonise with its surroundings.
This three-way bridge design was submitted by McClintic Marshall Products to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)
This three-way bridge design was submitted by McClintic Marshall Products to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)

PE Henderson Design

Engineer Peter Henderson went for a total visually simple design approach in 1857, it consisted of two masonry towers at either end and a flat strip of iron across the top.
This simple bridge design was submitted by P.E. Henderson to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)
This simple bridge design was submitted by P.E. Henderson to the Sydney Harbour Bridge competition. (Courtesy of Arterra Interactive)

‘Symbol of Hope’

The final design was awarded on March 24, 1924, to Dorman Long and Co for two reasons.

The first was the company’s previous experience with the Tyne Bridge in the United Kingdom, and the second, was because the traditional steel arch was not only more affordable, it was stronger and more robust than other designs.

Ultimately, it would come to symbolise hope, connection, and movement for a young Australia.

The Sydney Harbour Bridge illuminated purple to mark the Queen's Platinum Jubilee in Sydney, Australia, on June 2, 2022. (Brendon Thorne/Getty Images)
The Sydney Harbour Bridge illuminated purple to mark the Queen's Platinum Jubilee in Sydney, Australia, on June 2, 2022. (Brendon Thorne/Getty Images)

“We’ve realised that even the most minor details could affect how the developers, engineers, architects, and government perceive a specific design. Some designs were rejected because the judges thought they ‘wouldn’t harmonise the surroundings’ or because it was ’simple and elegant, but aesthetically too severe for its setting,’” an Arterra spokesperson told The Epoch Times.

“Creating an icon takes a long time, tremendous effort, and patience. The design itself took years to be approved, several designs to consider, and many concerns to tackle.

“And our team at Arterra Interactive genuinely believes that it’s still possible for us to create another icon like this, as long as Australians put their mind to it.”

New Year's Eve fireworks light up the sky over Sydney's iconic Harbour Bridge and Opera House (L) during the fireworks show on Jan. 1, 2022. (David Gray/AFP via Getty Images)
New Year's Eve fireworks light up the sky over Sydney's iconic Harbour Bridge and Opera House (L) during the fireworks show on Jan. 1, 2022. (David Gray/AFP via Getty Images)
Daniel Y. Teng is based in Brisbane, Australia. He focuses on national affairs including federal politics, COVID-19 response, and Australia-China relations. Got a tip? Contact him at [email protected].
twitter
Related Topics