Chinese Stocks Crash, Why Is Anybody Surprised?

Not because of new year’s resolutions.
Chinese Stocks Crash, Why Is Anybody Surprised?
A man works on the trading floor at the Shanghai Stock Exchange on September 22, 2015. (JOHANNES EISELE/AFP/Getty Images)
Valentin Schmid
1/4/2016
Updated:
1/5/2016

Western commentators complain that China’s 7 percent stock crash on Jan.4 is a dreadful start to the new year.

Well, technically speaking, the Chinese still can hope their new year is going to be better than the old one, since Chinese New Year isn’t until February 8.

Until then, it looks like it’s going to be downhill for the economy, stocks, and the yuan.

The Shanghai composite slipped 6.9 percent to 3296 on Jan. 4, triggering circuit breakers. The onshore yuan dropped 0.37 percent against the dollar.

(Google Finance)
(Google Finance)

Official GDP numbers come out on Jan. 19, but whatever the official number, real growth won’t be good judging from data on the ground.  

Market commentators blame recent weak manufacturing data and new IPOs, but analysts knew all of this beforehand.

In fact, if you look at any data coming out of China, whether it’s official or unofficial, all of it is pointing south. 

Research Firm Capital Economics compiled a chart book of important indicators for the Chinese economy based on official data, showing firmly established downtrends.

The currency will devalue further against the dollar because it has actually gotten stronger in trade weighted terms in 2015 and that’s what China cares about.

This is the only reason why China launched a trade weighted index for the yuan, so it has a justification to devalue further against the dollar. 

(Capital Economics)
(Capital Economics)

Official GDP growth slowed to 6.9 percent in the third quarter of 2015, but Capital Economic’s own activity proxy indicates growth of only 4 percent.

Electricity consumption, one of the best economic indicators, is not growing at all. 

(Capital Economics)
(Capital Economics)

Retail sales are still growing at 10 percent, but retail is not a large share of the economy and growth fell from a peak of almost 20 percent right after the financial crisis.

(Capital Economics)
(Capital Economics)

Trade has collapsed, firmly trending down.

(Capital Economics)
(Capital Economics)

Producer and commodity prices are deep in deflationary territory. Capital Economics is optimistic this will change soon though.

(Capital Economics)
(Capital Economics)

Credit is still growing, but also trending down. Also, the ratio of output per unit of credit decreased dramatically over the years.

(Capital Economics)
(Capital Economics)

Knowing all this, how can traders be surprised by weak manufacturing data? Hope dies last.

Valentin Schmid is a former business editor for the Epoch Times. His areas of expertise include global macroeconomic trends and financial markets, China, and Bitcoin. Before joining the paper in 2012, he worked as a portfolio manager for BNP Paribas in Amsterdam, London, Paris, and Hong Kong.
Related Topics