Chinese Internet Users in Need of ‘Education’ for Lack of Judgment, Says Official

February 10, 2016 Updated: February 11, 2016

Internet censorship in China is ubiquitous and well known, and for years the Chinese regime has provided different explanations for its bevy of restrictions. Traditionally, these have included the dangers of pornography, the threat of Western influences, the risks to social harmony.

But now the propaganda authorities have come out with a new one: Chinese Internet users just aren’t smart enough.

On Jan. 28, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), the Party agency in charge of Internet control, ran a story saying that Chinese Internet users had a major problem in exercising their judgment. The article was titled: “Ability to Critically Comprehend is Insufficient—Netizens Fail to Make the Grade.” The story was based on surveys from 35,880 Internet users conducted by the by KdNet Data Research Center, an institute run by the state-run newspaper Southern Metropolis Daily.

The survey examined the abilities of Internet users in three categories: “critical comprehension,” “using new media,” and “communicating using new media.”

Respondents were scored from 0 to 5. According to the results, average scores fell in the 3s, though the outcome for “critical comprehension” was the lowest, with an average score of 3.42.

But the definition of “critical comprehension” is not the one you might expect. The term appears to refer to the ability to critically evaluate and judge information, evidence, and arguments—but in an explanation of what it meant, the official website explained that critical comprehension referred to “an understanding of the content of online media, and the operating regulations and rules of the overall online media industry.”

He Lingnan, one of the researchers involved in the survey and a lecturer at Sun Yat-Sen University in southern China’s Guangdong Province, was quoted saying, in heavy bureaucratese: “The government… should pay more attention to the increasingly prominent issue of online behavior,” and that there should be “policy and institutional support, and specialized education, to encourage the improvement of behavior online.”

It is unclear if the Cyberspace Administration of China would be the one implementing the measures to better “educate” users in their online behavior and understanding of the law, though if this were to take place, it would likely result in more censorship.

Writing on news portal Sina, which originally published the results of the survey, an Internet user in Beijing commented: “According to the standard of the Chinese government, the more the Internet users praise the government, the better the quality they are considered to be.”

An example of supposed bad behavior—perhaps by someone whose critical comprehension of online behavior was insufficient—took place in September 2013, when a 20-year-old woman, surnamed Zhao, was arrested by police after she posted “I heard a murder was committed in Zhouzhuang. Does anyone know what actually happened?”

Though Zhao’s intent was only to get verification of the story, the police said she had caused a social disturbance, and that is why she was arrested.

Comprehend that.

Follow Frank on Twitter: @HwaiDer