But some say otherwise: the CCP isn’t waiting—it simply doesn’t have the money or fiscal space to do it.
That’s the view of William Lee, chief economist at the Milken Institute, an economic think tank based in California, and Christopher Balding, an expert on the Chinese economy at the Henry Jackson Society, a UK-based think tank.
In Mr. Balding’s view, China’s economy will be “very, very sluggish” and “turn into a long grinding mess as long as Beijing can draw it out.”
“People need to learn that the days of Chinese rapid growth—debt-fueled as it was—are basically over,” he told The Epoch Times. “And now they’re just trying to keep it from collapsing.”
Edward Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research, a global investment consultancy in New York, is more specific in his predictions. He said China’s economy would go into an “economic stagnation” that “could very well be for the next 10 to 20 years.”
“I think maybe whatever [the CCP] said that they think the economy can grow at, I would cut that in half,” he told The Epoch Times. “So we are looking at more like 0 to 2 percent growth for the next few years.”
CCP Can’t Pay for a Big Stimulus
Experts say that the CCP is simply unable to inject a significant boost into China’s economy.“Restructuring local debt or ‘solving’ the local government debt problem would change China’s entire economy,” Rhodium analysts warned about the decade-old problem. “Any meaningful resolution of the local debt problem would likely trigger a significant structural slowdown in investment, and a sharp slowdown in economic growth for the next decade.”
Local governments and the property sector are struggling together.
Mr. Balding said that the CCP doesn’t have the money to bail out developers and hopes that consumers will solve the problem by buying more real estate. But consumers have become more educated about the risks and won’t foot the bill.
The situation has evolved into one in which Beijing, local governments, and consumers are kicking the deflation ball to one another, he said, noting that consumers are not spending, and this low demand won’t lift China’s economy.
He used the example of Evergrande, the world’s most indebted property developer, to illustrate the size of the problem and why the CCP doesn’t have the money to bail out the property sector.
Mr. Balding equated that situation to an individual having $100,000 in the bank and $2 million overdue credit card debt. Hence, repaying the debt looks impossible.
If Evergrande’s debt were to be written off, that would swallow about 40 percent of ICBC’s capital.
Will the international community bail out the CCP? Mr. Balding thinks not.
“The very simple reason is that nobody in the world has the amount of capital that Beijing would need,” he said.
“The IMF doesn’t have that type of money,” he said, adding that neither do international investors.
CCP and the Private Sector
In recent months, Chinese authorities have turned to frequent new policy releases, stopping short of deploying concrete stimulus measures.“The government is not rolling out a strong set of fiscal stimulus measures because, number one, the fiscal space is limited because of the high indebtedness of the local and the federal government. So they cannot finance the fiscal spending by issuing debt,” Mr. Lee of the Milken Institute told The Epoch Times.
Mr. Balding called the new policies “do-nothing measures.”
Gary Ng, Asia Pacific senior economist at Natixis, a French corporate and investment bank, said that Chinese authorities have shown a change in policy direction, but its implementation is meeting hurdles.
For instance, most of the bank loans are still going to the “safe player” or state-owned companies (SOEs), he said. “For the private firms, I doubt how much money they can get because if we look at what happened in Country Garden recently, it’s quite clear that the stress is still very high.”
On Aug. 11, Country Garden, China’s biggest developer by 2022 sales, warned that it could lose as much as $7.6 billion for the first half of this year. It also confirmed earlier that it had missed $22.5 million in international bond payments. And this was after the company got a $7 billion credit line from a state-backed bank in November. On Aug. 14, the company suspended 11 of its domestic bond listings.
For land auctions, Mr. Ng said that SOEs now win 80 percent compared to 40 percent to 50 percent in the past. He added that local governments are holding down payments that are supposed to be passed through to developers when construction milestones are met.
“I think there is still a very clear pressure in terms of this preference towards the safer player. And the companies which need the liquidity the most still cannot get it,” Mr. Ng told The Epoch Times.
‘Telling a Communist Government Not to Be Communist’
To Mr. Balding, the communist regime and the private sector are fundamentally in conflict.“You’re telling a communist government not to be communist anymore when you say Beijing needs to encourage the private sector,” he said. “You’re telling the communist government, ‘If you’re not communist anymore, things will get better.’”
“I’m just going to be blunt,” he said, adding, “At the end of the day, all of Chinese economics is still about the state” because the Party controls the capital.
The CCP has built its legitimacy by telling the Chinese people that it was a good economic and financial manager of the country, Mr. Balding said. “Beijing cannot allow an event, a hard landing, a crisis, something like that; they simply cannot. Because if they do, that’s the end of the CCP.”
“And they will do everything they can to prevent that situation,” he added. But with limited resources and means, the CCP will likely drag the country’s decline for as long as possible.
Mr. Yardeni thinks the CCP is responsible for the country’s current economic woes as some of its past growth “was done with the speculative excesses and poor government policies, especially the one-child policy.”
The CCP’s foreign policy has also had a direct impact on China’s export markets.
“The foreign policy of China has been very aggressive and hostile towards the West. And the West has responded by recognizing that Western businesses need to be much less reliant on Chinese suppliers,” he added.
Confidence Is the Key
The ten-month decline in factory-gate prices suggests that the deflationary environment is “getting more and more entrenched,” according to Mr. Lee.He said the chain effect causes people to delay spending: when businesses are not doing well, they may lay off people. Given China’s over 20 percent youth unemployment rate, consumers are worried about their children’s and their own jobs. At the same time, the price of property, where many Chinese invested their savings, is falling.
“When wealth is dropping, and income is not secure, people don’t spend,” Mr. Lee added.
Mr. Ng agreed. The current economic situation didn’t happen overnight. But, in the past several years, households and companies still believed that they could earn more money in the future, according to him.
“But right now, everyone has become more cautious simply because they are not too certain about the future,” Mr. Ng said. “So I think, in a word, confidence is the most important thing to watch in the future.”
He added that regulatory uncertainty has also played an essential role in low confidence in the market. Mr. Ng said that the Chinese regime is no longer putting growth as its first priority. While there isn’t much coherence in Beijing’s current policies, if one has to summarize a new priority theme from the regime’s latest guidelines, it would be stability.
What signs do we need to see to know that the confidence is back? He mentioned two things.
“First, we will need to see a very clear rebound in consumption and corporate investment.
“And second, we will need to see a rebound in the asset prices in China as well, which generally is more related to equity, and real estate as well, because that will actually show that people are more confident in not putting the money in the bank savings and they’re willing to consume or invest.”
Mr. Ng doesn’t expect this to happen until at least the end of this year or early next year.
He pointed out that 2024 would be more challenging because it no longer has the “base factor,” referring to the low economic figures from 2022, a pandemic year, for 2023 to show growth.
“It’s really about next year because if we do not see a very meaningful pickup in consumer and corporate sentiment, then I think the growth prospect will be much more challenging next year,” he said.
In Mr. Yardeni’s view, China’s situation is similar to what happened in Japan in the late 1980s, pointing to the country’s property bubble and aging population.
“They’re going to be faced with a period of economic stagnation because of the demography, because of their speculative bubble bursting,” he said.
