A CBC article that used quotes from two individuals to characterize as “racist and inflammatory” a special edition of The Epoch Times on the Chinese communist regime’s coverup of the coronavirus outbreak has met with heavy criticism from media pundits and CBC News readers.
In addition, The Epoch Times found that at least 400 comments on the story had been removed from CBC’s website as of May 3. The vast majority of the deleted comments, some of which were captured by The Epoch Times before they were deleted, were critical of CBC’s reporting, but didn’t appear to violate submission guidelines.
In an emailed response, the CBC told The Epoch Times that it keeps a log of all deleted comments but declined to say how many comments were deleted from this particular article. The network also declined to answer why some of the deleted comments provided to them by The Epoch Times that don’t appear to violate any guidelines were deleted.
Negative Reaction to CBC
Still, among the comments that remained on the story as of May 3, the top 400 most-liked comments, with the exception of one, were all critical of CBC’s reporting. A handful were critical of both CBC and Epoch Times.
Cindy Gu, publisher of the Canadian editions of The Epoch Times, says that while CBC’s article had a headline claiming to reflect the view of Canadians based on comments from two people—one of whom was unnamed—the “overwhelming” response to CBC’s report from its own readers and readers on other platforms has been negative.
“The CBC claimed in its headline that Canadians were outraged by our reporting,” Gu said. “The response from many CBC readers and critics in Canada shows this to be false. Was the CBC unable to find any of the voices who appreciated our coverage, or were they simply not interested in hearing them?”
She adds that despite Epoch Times’ request, CBC has so far not retracted its article nor issued an apology.
Following are excerpts from the top five “most liked” comments on the article, with the number of likes indicated in brackets:
“Criticism of [Chinese] government … can’t be r[a]cist.” (217 likes)
“Very disappointed to see a story so slanted in favour of the CPC [Communist Party of China]. The CPC is not China and not the Chinese people.” (167 likes)
“I don’t understand why the media are so protective of the communist party of China which has no respect for human right[s] around the world.” (150 likes)
“It’s [The Epoch Times] a pro-democracy anti-comm publication. No wonder this media source [CBC] doesn’t like it.” (117 likes)
“I’m offended that Canada’s State Broadcaster is disseminating Chinese Communist Party propaganda with Canadian taxpayer funding.” (116 likes)
In addition to pushback from readers, the CBC has also met with backlash from pundits, including in an opinion piece that ran on the front page of the Saturday, May 2, edition of the National Post critical of the national broadcaster’s coverage of The Epoch Times.
On April 29, columnist Terry Glavin tweeted: “The CBC ombudsperson needs to deal with this. Should result in not just an apology to the Epoch Times, but to the Canadian public. The three (!) CBC journalists, and any producers involved, would benefit by being made to attend workshops in what racism is.”
The CBC’s article was in relation to an Epoch Times special edition recently delivered to some neighbourhoods in various provinces to showcase the publication’s reporting on the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) role in the global pandemic. Gu says this was done because the outlet considers “that information to be important to Canadians,” as well as to boost subscriptions.
The special edition includes coverage on how the Beijing regime hid the facts about the initial outbreak and caused a global pandemic, articles examining how the regime is hiding the true scale of infections and deaths, and other articles such as Beijing’s disinformation campaign on the pandemic.
Gu says after CBC’s article was published early on April 29, many people contacted The Epoch Times to express their support via phone and email, and some also complained that the CBC had been deleting their comments on the article.
The Epoch Times captured a few logs of the comments later that day and also after commenting was closed the following day, and discovered that at least 400 comments had been removed as of May 3. One log showed there were 3,339 comments at one time, while only 2,921 comments remained as of May 3. The vast majority of the missing ones are critical of the CBC’s reporting. The actual number of deleted comments could be higher as Epoch Times could not capture all the comments that were quickly deleted throughout the day.
All comments on CBC have to pass screening based on the submission guidelines before they appear in the comments section.
The screening is done either by moderators or by automated tools, according to Chuck Thompson, head of CBC public affairs.
The submission guidelines published by the CBC stipulate rules for commenting on articles, including the requirement that comments can’t be made anonymously, must be relevant to the topic, and be respectful and courteous.
That means that all of the 400 deleted comments must have passed the initial screening to be visible to the public before they were removed. It is not clear how many comments were rejected before becoming public.
According to Thompson, the rate of rejection is typically 10-20 percent, and could be as high as 50 percent if a story covers a “sensitive or highly controversial topic.”
“Comments may be rejected for a variety of reasons including straying off-topic, being insulting or abusive, breaking laws or violating community standards,” he said in an emailed response.
Moderators may then delete more comments even if they have already been made public.
“Despite our precautions, inappropriate comments occasionally slip through and, when identified, they are removed as part of quality assurance processes,” Thompson said.
It remains unclear how those 400 missing comments were deemed “inappropriate” under CBC’s submission guidelines. Most of the deleted comments examined by The Epoch Times do not appear to violate the stated guidelines.
For example, one deleted comment reads: “I guess the CBC doesn’t see any irony in the fact that they’ve been wrong throughout this pandemic more than the Epoch Times has.”
Another says, “Will any German Canadian feel offended now if a newspaper’s special edition reporting Konzentrationslager Auschwitz-Birkenau inside Nazi Germany? Ops, Rudy Gobert-Bourgarel wants you to think so. Really doubt whether CBC is now a Canadian taxpayer-funded State Mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party?”
The Epoch Times showed these sample comments along with others to Thompson and asked why they were removed, but received no response.
Following Epoch Times’ submission of questions to CBC, the total number of comments on the article rose to 2946, an increase of 25 compared to the previous total number on May 3, after commenting was closed in the morning of April 30. The Epoch Times didn’t check further what comments had been added back.
The negative response to the CBC’s coverage wasn’t limited to the commentary section of the article itself.
The senior reporter on the story, whose bio on Twitter says she is a “COVID-19 Fact-checker,” tweeted the link to the article. The post had three likes, zero retweets, and 26 comments as of May 5. On Twitter, when the number of comments is significantly higher than likes and retweets, that’s indicative of reaction to the post being mainly negative. Of the 26 comments, 25 are critical of CBC’s reporting.
“Your story far from lived up to the integrity I expect of the CBC,” reads the first comment on the tweet, which has five likes, more than the original post. It adds that “criticizing the CCP is not racist, as the CCP is a political party, not China nor the Chinese people themselves. Conflating the two is playing directly into CCP propaganda.”
With additional reporting by Omid Ghoreishi
The special edition can be downloaded here.
The Epoch Times was founded in 2000 in North America by Chinese immigrants and has been on the forefront of uncensored China news, breaking some of the most important China stories over the past two decades. It was among the first to report on the SARS outbreak in 2003 and won a national award in Canada for this coverage.
Since its launch, the independent news outlet has been the target of multiple attacks and interference from the Chinese communist regime. Last year, its printing press at its Hong Kong office was set on fire by masked intruders during the height of protests in that city. The Epoch Times believes that the Chinese Communist Party was behind the attack in an effort to silence the outlet.