Calls for Australia to Adopt US-Style ‘Green Card’ Among Proposals to Rejig Migration System

Calls for Australia to Adopt US-Style ‘Green Card’ Among Proposals to Rejig Migration System
A traffic controller stands outside a worksite along George Street in Sydney, Australia, on June 28, 2021. (Lisa Maree Williams/Getty Images)
Alfred Bui
12/19/2022
Updated:
12/20/2022

Australian universities are calling for wholesale reforms to the country’s immigration system including one proposal for a U.S.-style green card.

In a submission (pdf) to the federal government’s migration review, Universities Australia, which represents tertiary institutions across the country, said complicated visa structures were causing Australia to fall behind other advanced economies in attracting talented researchers and students.

The peak body said overseas research students needed to wait up to three years to have their visa application processed.

At the same time, less than a third of international graduates apply for work visas after completing their study programs in Australia.

Universities Australia CEO Catriona Jackson said while hundreds of thousands of international students enrolled to study in the country each year, only 16 percent obtained permanent residency.

The CEO said the figures were not surprising as there were many issues with the current migration program, such as extended wait times, a lack of transparency on visa application status, and migration policy uncertainty.

“With around 100 visa subclasses, our migration system is overly complex and not fit for purpose,” Jackson said.

“It deters rather than encourages the talented people we need.”

To tackle the problem, Universities Australia recommended the government automatically grant temporary graduate visas to eligible overseas students who complete their studies and develop a reporting protocol to provide students and related parties with up-to-date information about visa application status.

In addition, it proposed that the federal government establish a priority system similar to the green card in the United States to make Australia’s system more agile and flexible.

Another recommendation was to improve and simplify pathways into Australia for academic talent and exempt them from the skills assessment process.

“It’s time to hit the reset button and design a migration system that supports Australia’s future,” Jackson said.
“The current settings are slowing the flow of skilled workers and researchers who drive our economy and progress and are holding back international students who make us stronger.”

Migration System Under Review

Submissions are coming in as part of Home Affairs Minister Clare O'Neil review of the country’s migration system in September calling on the public to contribute their insight.
The government said it would raise the skilled migration cap from 160,000 to 195,000 places in the 2022-2023 financial year to tackle labour shortages.

It also hinted at other major changes to the system, including a simplification of visa categories and the possibility of abolishing permanent visa pathways for wealthy foreigners.

The government is expected to release a report on its migration system review in February 2023.

Calls to Target Young Skilled Migrants

Meanwhile, a submission by the Grattan Institute said that Australia could see an improvement in living standards, productivity growth, and the federal budget’s bottom line by granting more permanent resident visas to younger and higher-skilled migrants.

In the report, the Institute pointed out that only a quarter of the 1.4 million permanent visas issued in the past decade were granted to skilled migrants, while the rest came via the family and humanitarian streams.

A worker holds a box of iceberg lettuce at Queen Victoria Market in Melbourne, Australia, on June 7, 2022. (William West/AFP via Getty Images)
A worker holds a box of iceberg lettuce at Queen Victoria Market in Melbourne, Australia, on June 7, 2022. (William West/AFP via Getty Images)

It said while the figures portrayed the diverse objectives of the country’s migration program, the government should use permanent skilled visas to attract younger, higher-skilled migrants rather than address labour shortages with temporary skilled migrants.

The think tank explained that young permanent skilled migrants could maximise the well-being of the Australian community due to their long-term economic potential.

For instance, permanent skilled migrants arriving in Australia in their 20s and 30s are likely to stay in the workforce for 30 to 40 years and contribute more to the economy with their skills and experience.

Australian Prime Minister, Scott Morrison poses for photos with new Australians during the citizenship ceremony at Lake Burley Griffin on January 26, 2020 in Canberra, Australia. (Rohan Thomson/Getty Images)
Australian Prime Minister, Scott Morrison poses for photos with new Australians during the citizenship ceremony at Lake Burley Griffin on January 26, 2020 in Canberra, Australia. (Rohan Thomson/Getty Images)

In comparison, while temporary skilled migrants can help fill worker shortages, they also compete with younger, higher-skilled migrants for permanent residency, as data shows one in four permanent skilled visas go to temporary skilled visa-holders.

Furthermore, the Institute said increasing intake of less-skilled migrants to tackle labour shortages could increase the risk of undercutting wages and exploitation in many industries.

There are also concerns that the public will lose trust in the country’s migration program if Australia continues to take in more temporary skilled workers and moves toward a “guest worker” society.

Abolishing Business Investment and Innovation Program

Another key recommendation by the Institute was to scrap the Business Investment and Innovation Program (BIIP), which attracts older and less-skilled migrants allowing them into the country to operate existing or new businesses.

The report showed that BIIP visa holders earned very low incomes and were less likely to work compared to skilled migrants.

Specifically, according to Census 2016, an average BIIP visa holder earned around $25,000 (US$16,700) a year, while an average skilled worker reported an annual income of $64,000.

A chef serves food at a Japanese restaurant in Melbourne, Australia, on Oct. 22, 2021. (William West/AFP via Getty Images)
A chef serves food at a Japanese restaurant in Melbourne, Australia, on Oct. 22, 2021. (William West/AFP via Getty Images)

Meanwhile, BIIP visa holders also have lower skills, as over 60 percent do not have a higher education.

In comparison, one in three skilled migrants holds postgraduate qualifications, and another half have a bachelor’s degree.

In terms of financial benefits, the report stated that each independent skilled permanent migrant contributes a net gain of $390,000 to the Australian community, while each BIIP permanent migrant costs taxpayers $120,000 over their lifetime in Australia.

Alfred Bui is an Australian reporter based in Melbourne and focuses on local and business news. He is a former small business owner and has two master’s degrees in business and business law. Contact him at [email protected].
Related Topics