The Epoch Times
The Epoch Times
AD
The Epoch Times
Support Us
SHARE
USCourts

California Judge Refuses to Force Christian Baker to Make Wedding Cake Celebrating Same-Sex Marriage

Copy
Facebook
X
Truth
Gettr
LinkedIn
Telegram
Email
Save
California Judge Refuses to Force Christian Baker to Make Wedding Cake Celebrating Same-Sex Marriage
Undated photo of Cathy Miller, owner of Bakersfield, Calif., cake shop Tastries. A Christian, Miller was targeted by gay activists. Photo courtesy of Thomas More Society
Matthew Vadum
By Matthew Vadum
10/23/2022Updated: 10/24/2022

A Christian baker in California has prevailed in a lawsuit that a lesbian couple filed against her for refusing to bake a wedding cake to celebrate their marriage on religious grounds.

The left has been targeting Christian bakers for years for political purposes, asking religious bakers that are opposed to same-sex marriage to bake wedding cakes for gay marriages knowing that they'll be met with resistance. When the bakers refuse to make the cakes, these activists sue under anti-discrimination laws, hoping to secure favorable legal precedents.

In Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018), the Supreme Court sided with a Christian baker whom a gay couple had asked to create a custom cake to celebrate their union. A state human rights commission violated Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips’s First Amendment right to free exercise of religion by ruling against him, the court found. The high court will hear a similar case, 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, on Dec. 5.

The new ruling (pdf) by Judge Eric Bradshaw of the Superior Court of California in Kern County came on Oct. 21 in Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) v. Cathy’s Creations Inc.

DFEH claimed that Cathy Miller and Cathy’s Creations, which runs a small bakery called Tastries in Bakersfield, California, violated state civil rights law and discriminated against Eileen Rodriguez-del Rio and Mireya Rodriguez-del Rio because of their sexual orientation. The two were married in California in December 2016. Miller refused to bake a cake honoring their marriage, citing her sincerely held religious belief that marriage is intended to be between a man and a woman, but referred the couple to another bakery.

But DFEH “failed to prove the discriminatory intent required” by state law, Bradshaw determined.

“The evidence also affirmatively showed that defendants offered full and equal service to [the couple] by referring them to a comparable bakery,” he wrote.

Miller’s “pure and expressive speech is entitled to protection under the First Amendment.” The baking of a wedding cake by Tastries is “labor-intensive” and “artistic,” according to Bradshaw.

DFEH is “barred by defendants’ right to Free Speech under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution from enforcing the [state law] to compel or prohibit defendants’ speech.”

“We applaud the court for this decision,” one of Miller’s lawyers, Charles LiMandri, partner at LiMandri and Jonna, said in a statement.

“The freedom to practice one’s religion is enshrined in the First Amendment, and the United States Supreme Court has long upheld the freedom of artistic expression,” said LiMandri, who’s also special counsel to the Thomas More Society, the public interest law firm that acted for Miller’s.

“There’s a certain irony there that a law intended to protect individuals from religious discrimination was used to discriminate against Cathy for her religious beliefs,” said Paul Jonna, who’s also a partner at LiMandri and Jonna and special counsel to the Thomas More Society.

Jonna said Miller has mainstream Christian beliefs that are entitled to be respected by the courts.

“Cathy believes in the Bible,” he said in a statement. “The state was actually questioning the sincerity of Cathy’s faith.”

Jonna noted that Tastries is adorned with Christian decor and plays Christian music over its sound system.

“The fact that they called Miller’s open and sincerely held beliefs into question is almost as disturbing as quibbling over her status as an artist,” he said.

The Epoch Times reached out to DFEH for comment but didn’t receive a reply as of press time.

Matthew Vadum
Matthew Vadum
contributor
Matthew Vadum is an award-winning investigative journalist.
Author’s Selected Articles

Supreme Court Temporarily Shields DOGE From Freedom of Information Requests

May 23, 2025
Supreme Court Temporarily Shields DOGE From Freedom of Information Requests

Supreme Court Allows Trump Admin to Remove Labor Board Members for Now

May 22, 2025
Supreme Court Allows Trump Admin to Remove Labor Board Members for Now

Supreme Court Deadlocks, Leaves in Place Block on Nation’s First Religious Charter School

May 22, 2025
Supreme Court Deadlocks, Leaves in Place Block on Nation’s First Religious Charter School

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Fireworks Company’s Dispute With Consumer Product Regulator

May 22, 2025
Supreme Court Won’t Hear Fireworks Company’s Dispute With Consumer Product Regulator
Related Topics
California
Save
The Epoch Times
Copyright © 2000 - 2025 The Epoch Times Association Inc. All Rights Reserved.