And due to a recent rules change at the Nasdaq stock exchange, quite a few of those shares will likely end up in personal investment portfolios because certain index funds will be compelled to buy them. Index funds, which buy all the stocks in an index such as the S&P 500 or the Nasdaq-100, have been especially popular with retail investors and 401 (k) plans due to their relatively low cost and higher risk diversification.
Effective May 1, however, the Nasdaq changed its seasoning rules to allow a “fast track” for any IPO ranking within the top 40 of the index by market cap. This means that large companies can be added to the Nasdaq-100 in just 15 trading days, down from three months.
Some analysts have speculated that Nasdaq changed its criteria in order to win listings for large and lucrative IPOs, while potentially adding risk for retail investors.
“Reducing or ending the seasoning period only benefits the issuers, both of the IPO and of the index fund, not investors,” Paul Mueller, an economist with the Institute for Economic Research, told The Epoch Times. “Stocks often have the most volatility right after they are issued, which means they have more risk when they are first issued.”
S&P index funds alone would be forced to absorb roughly 19 percent of SpaceX’s available float once that company is included in their indices, Jay Woods, Chief Strategist at Freedom Capital Markets, told The Epoch Times in an emailed statement.
“Forced buying into an index does not reflect genuine investor conviction; it manufactures artificial demand,” Woods said. “When a passive fund is required to buy SpaceX because a rule change pushed it into the index, that fund isn’t making a judgment about fair value; it is executing an algorithm.”

Advocates of eliminating long seasoning periods say it would allow index investors to benefit if share prices gain after the initial offering, but Mueller disputes this.
“Companies have a strong incentive not to underprice their initial offering—so the idea that index fund investors, who are usually invested over long periods of time and seeking risk diversification, will be missing out on substantial returns if their funds are not allowed to access the initial shares is a stretch,” he said. “While there will certainly be examples of IPO shares with significant appreciation in their first 12 months of public trading, there are more where the shares ended that period below their IPO.”
In the case of SpaceX, founder Musk alone holds approximately 42 percent of the company’s equity and controls roughly 79 percent of votes through super-voting Class B shares, which carry 10 votes each, Woods said. By contrast, the public will be offered only 5 percent of SpaceX’s shares, each with a single vote, giving them little say in how the company is run.
“Under the prior rules, a company could be among the largest in the U.S. and still remain outside the index for months after coming to market despite having completed the seasoning period,” Spurling said. The changes Nasdaq implemented were “about ensuring the Nasdaq‑100 continues to reflect the market it is designed to measure, as market structure evolves.”
The seasoning rules for a stock to be included in S&P Dow Jones indices currently include a minimum market capitalization of $20.5 billion, one year of positive reported audited operating income, public offering of at least half the company’s outstanding shares, public trading of the company’s shares for at least 12 months, and demonstrated liquidity.

“On the surface, public equity markets appear healthy,” the report states. “In reality, these markets are defined by a shrinking opportunity set, narrow leadership, and returns driven by the reflexivity of index investing.”
Some fund managers see pros and cons in fast-tracking the largest issuers like SpaceX.
According to Tim Schwarzenberger, a portfolio manager with Inspire Investing, “the volatility concern is legitimate, but it may be overstated.”
The company’s $1.75 trillion valuation would immediately place it among the largest public companies in the world, Schwarzenberger said. “There is a reasonable argument that a company of that size should be reflected in major indexes sooner rather than later.”







