MONTREAL—Boeing says it doesn’t need to adjust its narrowbody aircraft strategy in light of the C Series partnership between Airbus and Bombardier Inc.
The Chicago-based manufacturer is increasing the number of 737 Max planes it will produce monthly to supply the record backlog of orders for its re-engined planes.
Boeing chairman, president, and CEO Dennis Muilenburg says its family of 737 planes is winning, including the smaller Max 7s. However, demand is focused on the larger Max 8 and 9 planes with 162 to 220 seats. It foresees demand for 41,000 aircraft over the next 20 years, including 29,000 narrowbodies.
Bombardier has said it expects to capture half of the 6,000 orders for 100- to 150-seat aircraft it forecasts over the next two decades.
Muilenburg says Boeing isn’t surprised by the partnership announced last week that will see its large European rival take a majority stake in the C Series for no financial payment.
While Boeing welcomes competition, Muilenburg repeatedly said during a quarterly conference call on Oct. 25 that all players need to play by the same rules.
Boeing filed a trade complaint with the U.S. Department of Commerce in April against the C Series, arguing the plane was heavily subsidized by the Canadian and Quebec governments that allowed Bombardier to sell the planes to Delta Air Lines at deep discount prices.
The planes were levied preliminary countervailing and anti-dumping duties that would quadruple the price of planes sold in the United States.
A final rate is slated to be announced in December. The U.S. International Trade Commission will decide in February if Boeing was harmed by the C Series.
Bombardier and Airbus believe the C Series will avoid duties because the planes sold to U.S. customers will be supplied by Airbus’ plant in Mobile, Ala. Boeing says that won’t let it escape duties.
Muilenburg acknowledged that Boeing’s trade complaint will have ripple effects with customers and countries but believes the relationship with Delta, Canada, and Britain will outlast any current threats of retaliation.
From The Canadian Press
