Why the All-Star Game Should Go Back to Being an Exhibition

The All-Star Game was once a fun exhibition that didn’t determine home-field advantage in the World Series. Here’s why they should return to that format.
Why the All-Star Game Should Go Back to Being an Exhibition
Pete Rose (L) is hugged by teammate Dick Dietz after scoring the winning run while running over catcher Ray Fosse (R), who suffered a separated shoulder on the play. AP Photo
|Updated:

Although Bud Selig successfully presided as commissioner over Major League Baseball for more than two decades, it was his shrugged-shoulder look at the end of the 2002 All-Star Game that fans remember him most for.

It was because of that 2002 exhibition, which ended somewhat anticlimactically in a 7–7 tie after 11 innings—amid a seas of boos—as both teams ran out of pitchers, that Selig decided to make it a more serious affair.

Selig, who introduced successful innovations like the wild card playoff system as well as interleague play, decided to award home-field advantage in the World Series to the winner of the All-Star Game. (Previous to that the leagues alternated home-field advantage.)

Of course, the game was originally supposed to be a not-so-serious affair for the fans and this year’s game in Cincinnati—at the Great American Ballpark—should be a reminder of why that is.

Dave Martin
Dave Martin
Author
Dave Martin is a New-York based writer as well as editor. He is the sports editor for the Epoch Times and is a consultant to private writers.
facebook
Related Topics