The Real Reasons Behind Negative Interest Rates and Banning Cash

James Grant, the chief editor of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer, recently said about negative interest rates and a ban on cash: “What precedes implementation of these ideas is a discussion of them. I think this is coming.”
The Real Reasons Behind Negative Interest Rates and Banning Cash
$100 notes lay in stacks at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing in Washington, D.C., on May, 20, 2013. Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Valentin Schmid
Updated:

News Analysis

James Grant, the chief editor of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer, recently said about negative interest rates and a ban on cash: “What precedes implementation of these ideas is a discussion of them. I think this is coming.”

Indeed, the orchestrated support from the usual suspects among the mainstream media, pundits, think tanks, banks, and governments around the world is astounding.

Both editorial boards of Bloomberg and The New York Times wrote two pieces in favor of banning cash. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers and European Central Bank President Mario Draghi voiced their support for the elimination of large currency notes. Only The Wall Street Journal didn’t exactly endorse the idea.

Willem Buiter, the chief economist of Citigroup, summed up the benefits—at least from the government’s point of view: All financial transactions can be taxed by the government or charged a fee by the banks, and bank runs are eliminated because there is nothing in the bank that’s worth making a run for.

Something is going to go wrong is what I'm saying.
James Grant
Valentin Schmid
Valentin Schmid
Author
Valentin Schmid is a former business editor for the Epoch Times. His areas of expertise include global macroeconomic trends and financial markets, China, and Bitcoin. Before joining the paper in 2012, he worked as a portfolio manager for BNP Paribas in Amsterdam, London, Paris, and Hong Kong.
Related Topics