The Iran Nuclear Deal—an Analysis

The Iran nuclear deal signed July 14 raises two questions: whether a better deal could have been negotiated and if no deal is better than this one. The answer to both questions is yes.
The Iran Nuclear Deal—an Analysis
Protesters rally against the nuclear deal with Iran in Times Square in New York on July 22, 2015. Kena Betancur/AFP/Getty Images
David Matas
Updated:

Remarks prepared for a rally at the Legislature, Winnipeg, Manitoba, July 30, 2015.

The Iran nuclear agreement, formally called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, between Iran on one side and the five permanent members of the Security Council, Germany, and the European Union on the other, signed July 14, 2015, raises two questions. One is whether a better deal could have been negotiated. The other is whether no deal is better than this deal. The answer to both questions is yes.

It defies understanding why those negotiating with Iran did not insist on a commitment from Iran to human rights as part of this deal.
David Matas
David Matas
Human Rights Lawyer
David Matas, an award-winning Canadian human rights lawyer and a member of the Order of Canada, serves on the board of directors of the Toronto-based International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development. In 2010 he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work related to the investigation of forced organ harvesting crimes against Falun Gong practitioners in China. Matas co-authored "Bloody Harvest: The Killing of Falun Gong for their Organs" and co-edited "State Organs: Transplant Abuse in China."
Related Topics