The Brussels Bombings and Their Meaning

The March 22 bombing attacks ... are simply another chapter in the ongoing Belgian intelligence and social failure.
The Brussels Bombings and Their Meaning
Anti-riot police officers surround right wing demonstrators who disturbed a tribute to the victims of terror attacks on Place de la Bourse in Brussels on March 27, 2016. Kristof Van Accom/AFP/Getty Images
David T. Jones
Updated:

“You go to Brussels—I was in Brussels a long time ago, 20 years ago, so beautiful, everything is so beautiful—it’s like living in a hellhole right now…” —Donald Trump

Much as it pains to quote Donald Trump on anything, he has a point about Brussels. Today, it is closer to a henhouse reflecting the frenzy of chickens awaiting the next fox. The city of 2016 is not the city of a generation ago.

At that point, my wife and I were diplomats assigned to the U.S. Embassy and U.S. Mission NATO. Brussels was the epitome of a good bourgeoisie city; that is, the metropolitan area and Belgium were prosperous, modern, politically sophisticated, and respected individual democratic rights and freedoms. The society “worked,” with excellent health care, reliable electricity/water, public education, good public transportation, and security for the average citizen.

Such did not happen by accident. Brussels/Belgium was tightly regulated with police and intelligence-related services ubiquitous but not obvious. Citizens carried a carte d'identité; police records for criminal or financial violations were comprehensive.