Science Polluted by Politics

Those self-serving, amoral, and cowardly agendas are eroding the very fabric of the historically respected study of “science,” in all its domains.

I feel compelled to congratulate the authors of the several related articles published in the Sept. 20–26 edition: Wesley J. Smith [“Say No to ‘Public Health’ Imperialism”], Stella Paul [“Whatever Happened to Informed Consent?”], Raw Egg Nationalist [“Who Regulates the Regulators?”], and H. Sterling Burnett [“Climate Studies Show ‘Consensus’ Claims to Be Based on Bullying, Not Science”].

Their articles are part of the developing “consensus” held by many of my medical colleagues that the purely scientific evidence-based community is polluted by political agenda. Those self-serving, amoral, and cowardly agendas are eroding the very fabric of the historically respected study of “science,” in all its domains. We face the analysis of climate fearing bullies. Ineffective inoculation against a ubiquitous virus is a commanded “vaccine” and their vaccine failure therapies for treatment are financially driven. The term “emergency” covers just about anything to justify authoritarianism. Woke is revealed to be self-destructive, yet the alphabet soup of correctness persists, if not growing in strength, as advocated by very tiny bullhorns amplified by the willing media.