Life After the Nuclear Security Summits: Are We Safe?

A series of Nuclear Security Summits since President Barack Obama took office in 2009 have raised global awareness and tightened security of the world’s stockpiles of highly enriched uranium and plutonium. The need for securing stockpiles was highlighted in February after Belgian authorities reported finding a 10-hour surveillance tape during raids linked to the Paris terrorist attacks. The tape showed the home of an official with the Belgian Nuclear Research Center. “Since the end of the Cold War, a variety of terrorist groups have tried to obtain weapons of mass destruction, and the threat has increased in recent years,” explains Richard Weitz, senior fellow and director of the Hudson Institute Center for Political-Military Relations. “The main impediment to nuclear terrorism is not organizing an attack, designing a weapon or recruiting volunteers willing to suffer martyrdom—it is obtaining the nuclear or radiological material needed to make an explosive device.” Russia did not attend the final summit that concluded April 1, and no more summits are planned. Without high profile leadership, Weitz cautions, progress on nuclear security may stall.
Life After the Nuclear Security Summits: Are We Safe?
Heads of state and attendees at the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, D.C., on April 1, 2016. Andrew Harrer/Getty Images
Richard Weitz
Updated:

WASHINGTON—Just before President Barack Obama hosted the last biennial Nuclear Security Summit of his presidency, Belgian authorities reported chilling evidence. Affiliates of the terrorists who attacked the Brussels airport and subway had also installed a surveillance camera outside the house of a senior nuclear worker.

This incident follows other instances of sabotage and extremism within the country’s nuclear industry, raising fears that terrorists want to cause a major nuclear accident or seize nuclear material that could perhaps be turned into a “dirty bomb.”

The nuclear summits, among Obama’s most successful national security innovations, have made considerable progress in raising awareness about this post-Cold War danger and securing measures to avert it, but the discovery in Brussels serves as a reminder how serious the global threat remains.

Since the end of the Cold War, a variety of terrorist groups have tried to obtain weapons of mass destruction, and the threat has increased in recent years. The so-called Islamic State and other contemporary terrorists have employed chemical weapons in several countries and seek even more powerful nuclear weapons.

Richard Weitz
Richard Weitz
Author
Richard Weitz is a Senior Fellow and Director of the Center for Political-Military Analysis at Hudson Institute and a freelance author.
Related Topics