Gold Wins in Three out of Four Scenarios, Says Macquarie Strategist

Gold Wins in Three out of Four Scenarios, Says Macquarie Strategist
American Eagle and South African Krugerrand gold bullion at the Chicago Coin Company in Chicago, Ill., on May 11, 2006. Monetary Metals, Inc. wants to make gold useful in the economy again. Scott Olson/Getty Images
Valentin Schmid
Updated:

Warren Buffett claims that gold is worthless because it doesn’t produce anything. Fair point, but what if the other sectors of the economy also stop producing?

“If you think of gold, the only way gold loses is if normal business and private sector cycles come back. If that is the case, gold goes back 100 dollars per ounce. The other outcomes—deflation, stagflation, hyperinflation—are good for gold,” said Viktor Shvets, global strategist for investment bank Macquarie Group, in an interview with Epoch Times. So gold wins in three out of four scenarios, but none of the three are particularly appealing.  

He believes that aggressive action by the world’s central banks after the financial crisis has covered up a lack of private sector productivity.

Valentin Schmid
Valentin Schmid
Author
Valentin Schmid is a former business editor for the Epoch Times. His areas of expertise include global macroeconomic trends and financial markets, China, and Bitcoin. Before joining the paper in 2012, he worked as a portfolio manager for BNP Paribas in Amsterdam, London, Paris, and Hong Kong.
Related Topics