Expert Drops Out of ‘Biased’ Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Pipeline Review

A prominent economist has dropped out of the Trans Mountain pipeline review, accusing the National Energy Board of betraying Canadians with a “biased” and “broken” process.
Expert Drops Out of ‘Biased’ Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Pipeline Review
A fishing boat passes the Kinder Morgan Burnaby Terminal in Burnaby, B.C., on May 2, 2014. A prominent economist has dropped out of the National Energy Board’s review of Kinder Morgan's proposed Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, which would nearly triple the capacity of the pipeline that carries crude oil to Vancouver to be loaded on tankers. The Canadian Press/Darryl Dyck
The Canadian Press
Updated:

VANCOUVER—A prominent economist has dropped out of the National Energy Board’s review of Kinder Morgan’s proposed Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, accusing the board of betraying Canadians with a “biased” and “broken” process.

Robyn Allan, an outspoken critic of the expansion, said she is withdrawing as an expert intervener because the review’s scope is so narrow that the outcome is predetermined.

“It’s a rigged game,” the former CEO of the Insurance Corp. of British Columbia said Wednesday, May 20. “We’re getting the scope that supports Kinder Morgan. It’s a private sector ‘How do we get to yes?’ masquerading as a public interest review.”

It's a rigged game.
Expert intervener Robyn Allan