Dutch City Moves to Ban Meat Ads in Public Spaces out of Climate Fears

Ads for fossil fuels, fossil fuel-powered cars, and holiday flights would also be banned

Dutch City Moves to Ban Meat Ads in Public Spaces out of Climate Fears
Portobello mushrooms stand in for meat patties in this recipe for veggie burgers with all the fixings. (Greg Dupree/TNS)
Nathan Worcester

Just west of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, another line has been breached in the global "war on meat." In the name of fighting climate change, the city of Haarlem has moved to outlaw at least some advertisements for meat in public areas.

The resolution, which refers to "bioproducts" rather than meat, came from Ziggy Klazes, a Haarlem city councilor who represents the GroenLinks (GreenLeft) party.
She called it her "raised middle finger to the meat industry" in a Sept. 3 column.

The law wouldn't take effect in 2024, to allow time to honor existing contracts with advertisers.

It would also ban ads for fossil fuels, fossil fuel-powered cars, and vacation flights from those same public spaces, which include bus stations and advertising columns.

The Bigger Picture

Haarlem's proposed ban comes as many environmentalists redouble their efforts to limit or even eliminate animal agriculture, particularly in the Netherlands.
The U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) attributes over 14 percent of greenhouse gas emissions to livestock, due in part to methane from their burps and farts.
Ninety-five percent of Dutch adults eat meat, though 75 percent don’t eat it every day, according to the country's national statistics agency.

As it happens, the Netherlands is a significant center of animal agriculture. That may soon change.

In June, after decades of ever-tougher laws targeting the ecological effects of farming, the Dutch government trumpeted one of its most aggressive moves yet.

It proposed massive, area-specific cuts to nitrogen emissions, ones large enough to shutter about a third of the nation's farms by 2030.

The announcement sparked intense protests by farmers, truckers, and others in and beyond the Netherlands—the latest since a similar round in 2019, after members of the liberal Democraten 66 (Democrats 66) party proposed slashing the country's livestock numbers in half.

The country is also home to a "food innovation hub" launched by the World Economic Forum (WEF) and partners ranging from MasterCard and PepsiCo to the UN's FAO.

A WEF white paper says such hubs can help countries "accelerate their food systems transformation."

So, what exactly does that "transformation" look like?

The very same white paper applauds work on "alternative foods and proteins"—in other words, soy-based fake beef, lab-grown meat substitutes, ground-up insects, and other options meant to replace conventional meat.

One Dutch trucker who protested over the summer thinks Haarlem's resolution is part of that bigger picture.

"It isn’t going well here in my country," Mark de Jong told The Epoch Times in an Aug. 9 message.

'It's Starting in Haarlem'

Wybren van Haga, a member of the Dutch Parliament and leader of the Belang van Nederland party, described the ban as "an attack on free enterprise and bad for the economy."

The Centrale Organisatie voor de Vleessector (The Central Organization for the Meat Sector) expressed similar worries about overreach, as reported by the Trouw newspaper and other Dutch sources.

Tom Russcher, press officer for the populist Forum voor Democratie (Forum for Democracy) party, isn't sure if the ban will stand up to a serious legal challenge.

He told The Epoch Times on Sept. 9 that it's part of a much larger trend: "the government deciding what people have to do."

His country already has restrictive policies on cigarette advertising. Could images of meat soon be treated the same way?

If so, Russcher said, "it's starting in Haarlem."

In an article for WATTPoultry.com, a publication aimed at the ag industry, American Roy Graber suggested that "the precedent appears to have been set" for similar bans elsewhere, even in the United States.

Meat Ads and 'Meatposting' Fill Some With Disgust

Meanwhile, many environmental groups are celebrating.
"The meat and dairy industry is responsible for 19 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. So this is good news for the climate," Greenpeace UK wrote in a tweet.
"This is a great step towards reduced meat consumption and the promotion of more sustainable food systems," Eurogroup for Animals wrote on Twitter.

While not all environmentalists are anti-meat, some eco-activists don't shy away from sharing their distaste at the very sight of animal flesh.

One 2021 article from the climate Substack “Heated” criticizes the common practice of "meatposting"—that is, sharing savory pictures of beef, pork, chicken, lamb, and other comestibles for carnivores on Facebook, Instagram, or other social media.

They argue that "meatposting" props up an industry they see as harmful to the planet.

GroenLinks responded to an initial email from The Epoch Times, but did not answer questions by press time.

Nathan Worcester covers national politics for The Epoch Times and has also focused on energy and the environment. Nathan has written about everything from fusion energy and ESG to Biden's classified documents and international conservative politics. He lives and works in Chicago. Nathan can be reached at [email protected].