Beijing tax authorities have thrown up another hurdle for Ai Weiwei and his legal team that seek to contest a politically charged tax case against the dissident-artist.
Ai’s attorney Pu Zhiqiang told The Epoch Times on Nov. 14 that they submitted a bank deposit certificate, a necessary step to be able to contest the charges against Ai and get the case reviewed.
After being released from jail Ai was hit with a demand that the company that produces his art, Beijing Fake Cultural Development Ltd., pay “back taxes.” Observers regard the charges as politically motivated.
But rather than accepting the bank deposit certificate as collateral and moving the case forward, the authorities demanded that the money—8.5 million yuan (US$1.3 million)—be paid directly into a tax bureau account.
“This is not required by the law, so we decided not to cooperate,” Pu said.
He said that they have complied with the tax bureau’s regulations, and that they have followed the law closely. The demand to directly pay the money over “makes us feel so humiliated,” Pu said.
Pu said his law firm has sent a notice to the tax bureau: “As tax payers, we are telling the tax authorities how we interpret the law and what we are expecting from them.”
After Ai Weiwei received a tax bill of 15.22 million yuan (US$2.4 million) on Nov. 1, donations have been pouring in, along with supportive messages.
Ai’s assistant Liu Yangping told The Epoch Times that the campaign to enlist “creditors” ended at midnight on Nov. 13 (or early on Nov. 14), and they had received 8.69 million yuan (US$1.37 million) from over 29,000 people. She said money still continued to pour in. Ai regards the monies as loans, not donations.
Pu has maintained that they will not pay the fine, instead requesting an administrative review. Ai has been threatened with jail if he fails to pay up.
Gao Ying, Ai’s mother, said in a radio interview that the enormous tax penalty was the authorities’ way of oppressing Ai, destroying his reputation, bankrupting him, and finally silencing him.
Pu sees major holes in the tax penalty story that he expects may be resolved through administration review—though that could take at least a year.
