After 17 Days Sitting in Water, Indians Win Protest

After sitting chin deep in water for 17 days, villagers in central India succeeded on Sept. 10 in forcing authorities to reverse the recent increase in dam water threatening to submerge their land.
After 17 Days Sitting in Water, Indians Win Protest
Protesters sitting in the water during a 17-daylong protest receive food from volunteers. Courtesy of Narmada Bachao Andolan
Venus Upadhayaya
Updated:
<a href="https://www.theepochtimes.com/assets/uploads/2015/07/A+determined+Satyagrahi.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-291058" title="A woman sits in the water in central India as part of a protest against an increase in dam water levels. After 17 days of sitting in the cold water, the government gave in to protester demands. (Courtesy of Narmada Bachao Andolan)" src="https://www.theepochtimes.com/assets/uploads/2015/07/A+determined+Satyagrahi-600x450.jpg" alt="A woman sits in the water in central India as part of a protest against an increase in dam water levels. After 17 days of sitting in the cold water, the government gave in to protester demands. (Courtesy of Narmada Bachao Andolan)" width="590" height="442"/></a>
A woman sits in the water in central India as part of a protest against an increase in dam water levels. After 17 days of sitting in the cold water, the government gave in to protester demands. (Courtesy of Narmada Bachao Andolan)

After sitting chin deep in water for 17 days, villagers in central India succeeded on Sept. 10 in forcing authorities to reverse the recent increase in dam water threatening to submerge their land.

When villagers in the Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh State discovered the water rising in the Omkareshwar and Indira Sagar dams, 51 of them literally threw themselves into the water in protest—and vowed to stay there, drowning if necessary, until their demands were heard.

The dams are part of the giant Narmada Dam project, consisting of a staggering 3,200 dams built along the Narmada River.

Since its inception in 1979, the project has been one of the most controversial in history, mostly over the issue of mass displacements without compensation.

The Supreme Court of India already ruled that land cannot be flooded without rehabilitating and compensating those affected first. This hard-fought battle was already won by Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), the movement behind the protest.

“It is against the Supreme Court of India’s order, which says that land should be given for the land taken before the completion of the dam. The order also says that rehabilitation policy must be implemented six months prior to the submergence of the acquired land,” said Sneha Chandna, an activist with the NBA.

Venus Upadhayaya
Venus Upadhayaya
Reporter
Venus Upadhayaya reports on India, China, and the Global South. Her traditional area of expertise is in Indian and South Asian geopolitics. Community media, sustainable development, and leadership remain her other areas of interest.
twitter
Related Topics