Anthony Albanese Against Daniel Andrew’s Belt and Road Deal with Beijing

Anthony Albanese Against Daniel Andrew’s Belt and Road Deal with Beijing
Australia's federal Labor leader Anthony Albanese speaks at a press conference with MP Chris Bowen in Sydney, Australia on Aug. 3, 2020. (Brook Mitchell/Getty Images)
Caden Pearson
8/29/2020
Updated:
8/30/2020

Australia’s national Labor leader, Anthony Albanese, has said that he is against the Belt and Road arrangements his state counterpart, Victorian Labor leader Daniel Andrews, made with Beijing.

“There shouldn’t be agreements that are inconsistent with Australia’s national interests or our foreign policy,” Albanese told ABC NewsRadio on Aug. 30.

The comments come after Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Foreign Affairs Minister Marise Payne announced on Aug. 27 a new Foreign Relations Bill that will allow the Commonwealth to scrutinize and potentially throw out arrangements made by any federal, state, and local governments—and government-related entities like universities—with foreign governments or related bodies that are deemed to work against Australia’s national interests.

“What Australia is doing is ensuring that arrangements that are entered into by state and territory governments are in Australia’s national interests,” Payne told Channel Nine on Aug. 27.

“Most importantly, we do our due diligence on those agreements and we ensure that they are consistent with our foreign policy approach,” the minister said.

Albanese told ABC RadioNews that it’s a matter for the Commonwealth whether states are allowed to make arrangements with foreign countries but made the point that the national Labor Party wouldn’t have signed up to the controversial Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the first place.

The Labor leader said he wants to see the September 2017 agreement made by then-Liberal Party trade minister Steven Ciobo under the Turnbull government that speaks about cooperation between Australian and China for building infrastructure in third-party countries, including BRI projects.

He went on to discuss the Port of Darwin in Australia’s far north, saying it should never have been sold to China.

“It’s hard to think of an Australian infrastructure asset that is more vital to our national interest than the Port of Darwin,” Albanese said, who opposed the deal when he was shadow infrastructure minister.

“It should never have been not in Australian hands,” he added, going on to say that the Port of Darwin is critical to Australia’s national interests.

Albanese then took aim at the Morrison government’s announcement of the new Foreign Relations Bill.

“This is a government that’s always there for the photo op, never there for the follow-up,” he said.

Albanese said the Australian government should respond to Beijing’s assertive diplomacy in a way that protects its national interests, saying that it’s not a partisan issue.

He admitted China has been intervening in Australia, as seen on university campuses and in other places.