Opinion

A Two State Solution for Israel and Palestine

A Two State Solution for Israel and Palestine
Israeli premier Benjamin Netanyahu is portrayed during his meeting with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry at Villa Taverna, U.S. Embassy, in Rome, Italy, on June 27, 2016. Giuseppe Lami/ANSA pool via AP
David Kilgour
David Kilgour
Human Right Advocate and Nobel Peace Prize Nominee
|Updated:

A peaceful end to the decades-old dispute between Israel and Palestine—a two-state solution—has long been indicated in surveys of public opinion among both populations.

Recently at a conference of “Parliamentarians For Peace” in Tokyo, Hilik Bar, Deputy Speaker of the Israeli Knesset and secretary-general of its Labor Party, noted that the two-state solution also continues to enjoy widespread support among members of Israel’s parliament. Bar believes that the final status of the Palestinian territories and sovereignty over them should be settled in accordance with the “two states for two peoples” principle.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appears to be overlooking voices of many of his Likud Party moderates on the issue. Efforts to obtain his commitment to the diplomatic process are being thwarted by Education Minister and leader of the pro-settlement Jewish Home party Naftali Bennett, who is dead set against a two-state solution.

Bennett recently encouraged advancing additional development plans in the West Bank settlement of Beit El, saying that the “dream is that (the West Bank) will be part of sovereign Israel.” Others responded that “his dream and the minority he represents is Israel’s nightmare,” but Bennett could still bring down the government.

Emboldened by Republican wins in the recent American elections, Bennett and other right-wing Knesset members have called anew for the abandonment of a two-state solution, claiming that the “combination of changes in the U.S., in Europe and in the region provide Israel with a unique opportunity to reset and rethink everything.”

 President-elect Donald Trump has just nominated David Friedman as ambassador to Israel.  Friedman’s opposition to the two-state solution foreshadows a major shift in Washington’s policy, which has been the basis for U.S. and international diplomacy for decades as the best route to sustainable peace.  

“This nomination is reckless, putting America’s reputation in the region and credibility around the world at risk,” says Jeremy Ben-Ami, president of the Washington-based J Street, a liberal Jewish Middle East policy group dedicated to the two-state outcome. “(U.S.) senators should know that the majority of Jewish Americans oppose the views and the values this nominee represents.”

Rabbi Rick Jacobs, president of the large Union for Reform Judaism in the United States concurs, expressing concern about Friedman’s personal connection to a number of organizations committed to building additional settlements in the West Bank. “We continue to believe—as have both the American and Israeli governments for a generation—that only a two-state solution will allow Israel to remain both Jewish and democratic while also addressing the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinians.”

David Kilgour
David Kilgour
Human Right Advocate and Nobel Peace Prize Nominee
David Kilgour, J.D., former Canadian Secretary of State for Asia-Pacific, senior member of the Canadian Parliament and nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work related to the investigation of forced organ harvesting crimes against Falun Gong practitioners in China, He was a Crowne Prosecutor and longtime expert commentator of the CCP's persecution of Falun Gong and human rights issues in Africa. He co-authored Bloody Harvest: Killed for Their Organs and La Mission au Rwanda.