- States that withdrew from the federal pandemic unemployment bonus in June saw improving jobs numbers and fewer individuals filing for benefits compared to other states, Department of Labor data analyzed by the Daily Caller News Foundation showed.
- “I continued to see increases in the number of unemployed and, in some weeks, increases in the new regular claims that were coming in,” Republican Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves, who was among the first governors to cancel the benefit, told the DCNF in an interview. “So I felt we had to make a decision because if we wanted to experience a full economic recovery, we had to get our people back to work.”
- The states that stopped offering residents the federal benefit in early June experienced a 33 percent drop in new jobless claims filed compared to the roughly 4 percent decline seen in states that didn’t withdraw from the program, according to the data.
States that withdrew from the federal pandemic unemployment bonus in June saw improving jobs numbers and fewer individuals filing for benefits compared to other states, according the Daily Caller News Foundation’s analysis of federal data.
The states, most of which are Republican-led, that stopped offering residents the federal benefit in early June experienced a 33 percent drop in new jobless claims filed compared to the roughly 4 percent decline seen in states that didn’t withdraw from the program, Department of Labor data analyzed by the DCNF showed. Governors pulled out of the Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation (FPUC) program, a weekly $300 bonus given to out-of-work Americans on top of state benefits, due to stagnating job growth and a worsening nationwide labor shortage.
“I continued to see increases in the number of unemployed and, in some weeks, increases in the new regular claims that were coming in,” Republican Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves told the DCNF in an interview. “So I felt we had to make a decision because if we wanted to experience a full economic recovery, we had to get our people back to work.”
On May 10, following an underwhelming April jobs report, Reeves became one of the first governors to announce that his state would no longer participate in FPUC beginning June 12, citing the high number of job vacancies. His decision was influenced by conversations with Mississippi small business owners and workers who were severely understaffed and overworked as business activity picked up, he told the DCNF.
In addition to Mississippi, Alaska, Iowa and Missouri were the first to officially stop offering the bonus on June 12.
The number of individuals filing for weekly jobless claims in those four states has declined more than 33 percent in the four weeks since June 12 compared the four weeks prior, according to Labor Department data. In that same period, new claims dropped 12 percent in states that withdrew from FPUC later in June, 10 percent in states pulling out in July and just under 4 percent in states that will remain in the program through September when it expires.
Altogether, 25 states either pulled out in June or earlier this month. Louisiana will withdraw on July 31.
‘A Good Sign’ For Labor Participation
The average labor force size—the total number of individuals employed or actively looking for work—increased 0.25 percent last month in states that withdrew from the program at any point in June, the analyzed labor data showed. In states that will remain enrolled in FPUC until September, the average labor force ticked up 0.13 percent.
“It is a good sign to see more Iowans enter the labor force after leaving federal unemployment programs mid-June,” Iowa Workforce Development (IWD) Director Beth Townsend said in a statement shared with the DCNF.
Foot traffic in IWD facilities that assist unemployed residents with their job search skyrocketed from 1,903 in May to 5,220 in June, Pat Garrett, a spokesperson for Republican Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds, told the DCNF. Iowa’s unemployment rate increased slightly from 3.9 percent to 4 percent last month, but its labor force participation rate increased to the ninth-highest in the U.S., Garrett said.
The average unemployment rate in states that withdrew from FPUC in June was unchanged at 4.3 percent while it decreased slightly from 5.9 percent to 5.8 percent in states that haven’t withdrawn, according to Labor Department data. Before the pandemic, the national unemployment rate was 3.5 percent.
“Over the past several months employers across the state have reported worker shortages in all industries,” Catherine Muñoz, deputy commissioner of Alaska’s Department of Labor, told the DCNF. “It’s too early to assess the full impacts of ending the $300 weekly payment, but the trend seems to indicate that the economy is opening up and people are successfully finding employment.”
The FPUC program, which was first introduced at the beginning of the pandemic, had been set to expire on March 14 before President Joe Biden and Democrats extended it through Sept. 6 via the American Rescue Plan. Since then, job openings have steadily increased even as the economy has continued to recover.
‘If You Pay For Unemployment, You’ll Get More Unemployment’
Total U.S. job vacancies hit a record 9.21 million in May, according to a recent Labor Department report. Like Reeves, Republicans and business groups such as the Chamber of Commerce have blamed the labor shortage on the $300 weekly benefit.
A recent Morning Consult poll appeared to support the theory, showing that 13 percent of the more than 14 million Americans receiving unemployment benefits recently turned down job offers because they earned enough in government assistance.
“If you pay for something, you’re going to get more of it,” Casey Mulligan, former White House Council of Economic Advisers chief economist and a University of Chicago economics professor, told the DCNF in an interview. “If you pay for unemployment, you’ll get more unemployment.”
“There are really no surprises in what’s happening here,” he continued. “I know the Biden people act surprised, but this is something we predicted as a quantitative matter and all the different patterns were known and predicted over a year ago.”
Mulligan published two reports last year which projected that continuing the federal unemployment bonus would lead to higher job openings. In August 2020, after the first pandemic bonus ended, job vacancies rapidly declined, according to one of the reports.
A Congressional Budget Office report published in February supported the prediction.
“There’s simply no other explanation for the very unique situation we have right now where we have a record high number of job openings and yet a relatively high unemployment rate,” Heritage Foundation research fellow Rachel Greszler told the DCNF. “The last time that we had a similar unemployment rate as we do today, we had 4.7 million job openings. So, just a little more than half the level that are there today.”
“The main culprit is these unemployment insurance benefits,” she said.
The U.S. economy has added more than 3 million jobs since January, but the national unemployment rate has remained elevated, hovering near 6 percent for consecutive months. The national labor force participation rate held at 61.6 percent in June, significantly lower than its pre-pandemic level, according to additional data.
Biden Administration Denies ‘Measurable’ Impact On Joblessness
The Biden administration, though, has pushed back on criticism of FPUC, arguing that fear of coronavirus and continued child care needs are driving the labor shortage, not the bonus. The president said the $300 weekly benefit wasn’t having a “measurable” effect on stagnant job hirings and increasing job vacancies during a press conference in May.
However, child care needs aren’t the main cause of the shortage of workers in the U.S., according to a June Peterson Institute study from Jason Furman, who served as former President Barack Obama’s top economist. In addition, the amount of Americans who fear contracting coronavirus while working recently hit a pandemic low.
“The virus has very clearly receded, it doesn’t mean every single person feels that way, but the vast majority of people see it that way,” Mulligan told the DCNF. “That’s why the businesses have all these vacancies because their customers see it that way.”
The former senior White House official added that the Biden administration has attempted to argue customers know more about the occupational risks of a workplace than workers. Historical evidence has shown the opposite, according to Mulligan.
“It defies really any kind of common sense or analytical reasoning,” Mulligan said.
By Thomas Catenacci. Madeline Dovi contributed to this report.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact email@example.com.