Constitutional Rights

Pro-Second Amendment groups proclaim decison in NRA v. Maria T. Vullo as a victory for all issue advocacy groups.

The plaintiffs argue that the surveillance system is an overstep of authority and a violation of their Fourth Amendment rights.

All 3 liberal justices dissented from decision overturning the Ninth Circuit, which found an Arizona man was entitled to a new sentencing hearing.

A nearly identical bill was vetoed last year by then-Gov. John Bel Edwards.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit had rejected the NRA’s First Amendment arguments.

Property owners are fighting a Prohibition-era Supreme Court decision that laid the groundwork for government agents to enter and search private land at will.

The residents have argued that the monument expresses ‘a racially discriminatory message.’

The rule pertains to how many firearms an individual citizen can sell before they are considered a gun dealer.

A federal judge tossed the suit, saying it was barred by federal law. But an appeals court has reinstated it.

‘Mexico and anti-gun activists are trying to blame and bankrupt American companies that follow the law,’ Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen said.

‘I am thrilled to announce that we have achieved a major victory in the long, hard fight against the State,’ said Atilis Gym co-owner Ian Smith.

The 2013 Maryland statute outlaws so-called assault weapons such as the AR-15 rifle. The lawsuit remains pending in a lower court.

A hemophiliac in a remote part of California says state law hinders treatment for her life-threatening disease.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito recently said that an upside-down flag was briefly flown at his home.

The judge ruled in favor of a clergyman who has long sought to pray on those steps.

The 18 states argue that the EEOC overstepped its legal authority when it issued new sexual harassment guidance.

The decision involving the federal “felon-in-possession” law adds to the ongoing “Circuit Split” over the scope of the Second Amendment.

Fines would be imposed retroactively and calculated based on each corporation’s emissions from 1995 to 2024, according to the legislation.

The state Supreme Court issued a 6–0 ruling on the matter, with one justice recusing himself.