HHS Probed EcoHealth Over Alleged ‘Major Fraud’ Against US, Emails Show

HHS Probed EcoHealth Over Alleged ‘Major Fraud’ Against US, Emails Show
Laboratory technicians wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) work on samples to be tested for the Covid-19 coronavirus at a Covid-19 testing facility in Wuhan in China's central Hubei Province early on Aug. 5, 2021. STR/AFP via Getty Images
Eva Fu
Updated:
0:00

The Department of Health and Human Services’s watchdog briefly probed EcoHealth Alliance, a New York nonprofit that has collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, over alleged “major fraud against the United States,” newly released emails show.

The four-month-long probe, which opened in September 2020, centered around an allegation that “the COVID-19 virus was generated in ... China with the assistance of an NIH [National Institutes of Health] Grant.”

The Office of Investigations of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revealed the investigation in an email with the subject line “Grant Information Review [Redacted]” and dated Dec. 3, 2020, according to redacted copies of the documents obtained by U.S. Right to Know, a public health advocacy group.

A tip from an outside source had prompted the office to open the case, a special agent wrote in an attached memorandum to Ashley Sanders, an investigative officer at the NIH. Another correspondence issued in January 2021 confirmed that EcoHealth Alliance, which worked with a high-level Wuhan lab for years to conduct risky bat coronavirus research, was one of the targets. The name of the other party was redacted.

Such allegations, if true, would constitute a violation of the U.S. federal law, Title 18 of U.S. Code §1031, “major fraud against the United States,” according to the memorandum. Under this law, anyone who tries “to obtain money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises” in grant, contract, subcontract, or other forms of federal assistance valuing $1 million or more could receive a $1 million fine, up to 10 years in prison, or both.
Peter Daszak, right, the president of the EcoHealth Alliance, is seen in Wuhan, China, on Feb. 3, 2021. (Hector Retamal/AFP via Getty Images)
Peter Daszak, right, the president of the EcoHealth Alliance, is seen in Wuhan, China, on Feb. 3, 2021. Hector Retamal/AFP via Getty Images

The office referred the case to its special investigative branch on Sept. 9, 2020, and agents reviewed the allegation and met with NIH representatives on the same day, according to the memorandum. Details of the meeting and a description of the subsequent step taken by the agents on Sept. 29 were redacted.

The investigators closed the probe on Jan. 11, 2021. In a letter informing Sanders of the decision, a special agent said they were asked to support efforts “regarding a high-profile situation that involved [redacted] HHS Grantee that had ties to the COVID-19 virus.” The reason for such a move was entirely redacted, except for the word “developments,” although the agent noted that the agency “reserves the right to reopen the investigation if any new, relevant information is discovered relating to this incident.”

The revelation of the existence of the investigation comes as NIH, which is overseen by HHS, approved millions of dollars in new grants to EcoHealth for studies in Asia into novel viruses that could infect humans and cause an outbreak.
In August, the NIH terminated funding for EcoHealth’s Chinese partner, the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), citing failed efforts to gain lab entries and other records relating to the facility’s experiments that were the subject of the grant.
The P4 laboratory, designated as the highest level of biological safety, at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, on April 17, 2020. (AFP via Getty Images/Hector Retamal)
The P4 laboratory, designated as the highest level of biological safety, at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, on April 17, 2020. AFP via Getty Images/Hector Retamal

To retain the funding for the project, “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” EcoHealth would have to come up with a proposal that excludes the Wuhan lab’s involvement within 30 days, NIH wrote in an August letter to EcoHealth. The NIH didn’t respond to multiple requests from The Epoch Times to clarify the status of the grant.

Under the grant, researchers at WIV conducted experiments that resulted in a more lethal version of a bat coronavirus, a process that some experts said is a form of gain-of-function research—experiments that boost the transmissibility or pathogenicity of a virus.
Emails show that the same project had drawn FBI scrutiny months before the HHS began its review of EcoHealth. Sanders, the point of contact during the HHS’s internal investigation later, was set to hold a call with FBI agent David Miller, an email dated May 22, 2020, shows.
Last June, the HHS Office of the Inspector General announced that it will review NIH-funded programs to ensure that grant recipients, including foreign sub-recipients, are complying with federal requirements, a process that could apply to the Wuhan facility.

Representatives for the HHS Office of the Inspector General and EcoHealth didn’t respond to requests for comment by press time.

Eva Fu
Eva Fu
Reporter
Eva Fu is a New York-based writer for The Epoch Times focusing on U.S. politics, U.S.-China relations, religious freedom, and human rights. Contact Eva at [email protected]
twitter
Related Topics