US Ramps Up Tough Actions Against Beijing

By Cathy He
Cathy He
Cathy He
Cathy He is a New York-based editor focusing on U.S. China-related topics. She previously worked as a government lawyer in Australia. She joined The Epoch Times in February 2018. Contact Cathy at
June 10, 2020Updated: June 10, 2020

The United States is escalating efforts to counter the Chinese regime in response to its malign actions during the pandemic and now, over Hong Kong.

Over the past few months, the Trump administration has vociferously demanded that the regime be held accountable for its coverup of the CCP virus outbreak. It has also enacted measures targeting threats stemming from Beijing, ranging from intellectual property (IP) theft to security risks posed by Chinese telecom giant Huawei.

Then, in late May, the Chinese regime moved to impose a national security law over Hong Kong, which critics say would mark the end of the city’s freedoms and autonomy. It prompted President Donald Trump to announce on May 29 that Washington would begin the process of eliminating Hong Kong’s preferential economic treatment and sanctioning officials involved in eroding the city’s autonomy.

“I think it’s clear that the United States is very rapidly moving to essentially declaring China an enemy,” Harry J. Kazianis, a national security expert at the Washington-based think tank Center for the National Interest, told The Epoch Times.

Observers have described Trump’s 10-minute speech on the administration’s China policy on May 29 as a watershed moment in U.S.-China relations. In it, he criticized Beijing’s sweeping campaign to steal American IP, aggressive military actions in the South China Sea, coverup of the pandemic, influence over the World Health Organization (WHO), and its “absolute smothering” of Hong Kong’s freedoms.

Frank Gaffney, vice chairman of the advocacy group Committee on the Present Danger: China, told The Epoch Times that Trump’s remarks were “the most articulate public statement by a president of the United States about the danger of the Chinese Communist Party” that he had heard in his lifetime.

Gaffney said the speech was “epic” in its “depiction of an enemy of the United States that is pursuing—not just rhetorically but in a comprehensive way—our destruction.”

That day, Trump also announced the United States’ formal withdrawal from the WHO, the barring of Chinese graduate students tied to the Chinese military, and a review into Chinese companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges.

While the speech signaled a tougher approach towards Beijing, it was also a continuation of the administration’s China policy, which has hardened since the “high point” of relations when Trump met Chinese leader Xi Jinping at the Mar-a-Lago resort in 2017, said June Teufel Dreyer, a political science professor at the University of Miami.

The “final catalyst” for the administration was “the combination of concealing the lethal nature of the coronavirus plus Beijing’s reneging on its promises to Hong Kong, with horrific stories coming out of Xinjiang,” Dreyer said in an email, referring to Beijing’s suppression of Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in the northwestern region of Xinjiang.

Some U.S. lawmakers and observers describe the current state of U.S.-China relations as a return to “cold war”-style tensions. But Gaffney said this descriptor was misleading because the communist regime had been waging “unrestricted warfare” on America for decades.

A strategy crafted by Chinese military officials in the late 1990s, unrestricted warfare refers to using a series of unconventional tactics designed to accomplish the goals of war without engaging in actual combat. These include widespread theft of foreign trade secrets, dominating critical industries and infrastructure, and utilizing media and information channels to shift global public perceptions in favor of the Chinese regime.

“The Soviets had an agenda of taking us down, but I don’t think they pursued it with anything remotely like the comprehensiveness, patience, determination, and resources that the Chinese Communist Party is bringing to bear on us now,” Gaffney said.

Economic Distancing

Trump last week directed a presidential working group on financial markets to suggest actions within 60 days to crack down on Chinese companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges that fail to comply with U.S. accounting rules.

The Chinese regime has blocked U.S. regulators from inspecting the audit work papers of Chinese companies, saying that they contain “state secrets.”

Critics say the lack of oversight of these companies puts American investors at risk, citing the growing number of Chinese companies that have been embroiled in fraud scandals—the latest being Nasdaq-listed Luckin Coffee, which in April reported that senior managers fabricated more than $300 million in sales.

In May, the administration also directed the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB)—the independent body that oversees the pension fund for federal employees and military members—to halt plans to invest in stocks of Chinese companies that pose national security and human rights concerns. The FRTIB, in response, announced it would delay the investment move.

Gaffney said it was critical that the United States “stop underwriting the Chinese Communist Party.”

We need to “ensure that the Chinese Communist Party no longer is able to count on our financing for the myriad ways in which they’re waging war against us,” he said.

The pandemic has also prompted the administration to accelerate plans to remove critical supply chains out of China, Reuters reported, as the public health crisis has exposed the pitfalls of the United States’ dependency on the country as a manufacturing base.

Kazianis said that if Trump wins re-election, we would not only expect to see more action to decouple from China, but also an education campaign aimed at explaining to the American public why reducing U.S. supply chain reliance on China is necessary.

“The biggest thing that is difficult for the American people to understand is they hear all these challenges from China, threats from China, but at the same time, we’re still buying hundreds of billions of dollars of products from China every year,” he said.

Human Rights

Joseph Bosco, former China country director of the office of the Secretary of Defense, said the administration should place human rights issues on the table when dealing with the regime.

He suggested invoking the Magnitsky Act to sanction Chinese officials involved in human rights abuses, including the persecution of religious groups, ethnic minorities, and dissidents.

The former official said Washington should also launch a campaign to broadcast into China and Hong Kong information about “Beijing’s constant and escalating violations of human rights, its threatening and aggressive behavior to China’s neighbors including Taiwan, and its lawless and irresponsible conduct in enabling the release of the pandemic from Wuhan to the world.”

On the Chinese side, the regime is coming to accept the shift in U.S. opinion, Kazianis said.

Beijing understands that “this administration and by and large, the academic community in Washington, China scholars, and now I think the American people, have really awoken to the fact that China has done a lot of things to designate itself as an enemy of the United States,” he said.

The Chinese regime is likely “the greatest threat Washington faces since the Soviet Union,” he added.