US Prosecutors Seek to Disqualify Huawei’s Lead Lawyer in Iran Sanctions Case

US Prosecutors Seek to Disqualify Huawei’s Lead Lawyer in Iran Sanctions Case
FILE PHOTO: Huawei attorney James Cole was Deputy Attorney General from December 2010 to January 2015. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Cathy He
9/4/2019
Updated:
9/4/2019

BROOKLYN, NEW YORK—Federal prosecutors on Sept. 4 sought to disqualify a former U.S. Justice Department (DOJ) official who is now the lead lawyer defending Chinese tech giant Huawei in a case alleging the company of bank fraud and sanctions violations, on the grounds of conflict of interest.

Prosecutors told Judge Ann Donnelly of the U.S. District Court in the eastern district of New York that Huawei lawyer James Cole previously worked as the No. 2 official in the DOJ, meaning that he had access to confidential information that he can use against the federal government in the current Huawei case.

“There are very specific pieces of information very related to this matter that Mr. Cole has ... that relates to [Huawei],” U.S. prosecutor David Kessler told the court.

Prosecutors did not provide details of the information during the public court hearing, as it involved classified information relating to national security. Judge Coleman allowed an application by the prosecution for such evidence to be heard in closed court.

Kessler also asked the judge to take into account the fact that Cole is but one attorney among a large legal team comprising five law firms representing Huawei. Hence, Cole’s disqualification would not impact Huawei’s ability to find more lawyers, he said.

Lawyer for Huawei Michael Levy argued that Cole had left the department before 2017, which is the time they believe the investigation into Huawei started, and therefore did not have access to the government’s confidential information relevant to the case.

Huawei’s attorney also argued that the government, in waiting more than a year to initiate a motion to disqualify Cole, had waived its right to do so.

Levy said that the delay was a “tactical step” on the part of the government as “part of its overall agenda against Huawei.” Kessler, in response, said that the government had an explanation for the delay it could provide in closed court.

In a 13-count indictment unsealed in January, the DOJ alleged that the Chinese tech giant and its U.S. subsidiary misled global banks and U.S. authorities about its relationship with a Hong Kong firm named Skycom Tech—which was, in fact, an unofficial subsidiary of Huawei that conducted business in Iran, in violation of U.S. sanctions.

The company’s chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, is also personally indicted in this case. She was arrested in Canada last December and is currently fighting extradition proceedings.

Besides these charges, Huawei is also fighting a separate indictment alleging that it stole trade secrets from U.S. mobile carrier T-Mobile. The company was also effectively blacklisted from doing business with U.S. companies in May, after the U.S. administration deemed that it posed national security concerns.

Cathy He is the politics editor at the Washington D.C. bureau. She was previously an editor for U.S.-China and a reporter covering U.S.-China relations.
twitter
Related Topics