One-Sided War of Words Erupts Over US-China Military Posture

August 24, 2010 3:33 am Last Updated: October 1, 2015 7:15 pm

The South Korean amphibious landing ship ROKS Dokdo and the aircraft carrier USS George Washington during readiness exercise on July 27, 2010. (Adam K. Thomas/U.S. Navy via Getty Images)
The South Korean amphibious landing ship ROKS Dokdo and the aircraft carrier USS George Washington during readiness exercise on July 27, 2010. (Adam K. Thomas/U.S. Navy via Getty Images)
While the United States has sought in a recent Pentagon report and other public statements to be conciliatory toward China, prominent statements in the Chinese press have been aggressive, if not bellicose.

Analysts have posited a number of explanations for the Chinese regime’s rhetoric, including that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is playing the nationalism card to boost its legitimacy or taking advantage of the United States’ accommodating approach to seize the geopolitical upper hand, or the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is seeking to increase its influence on the Chinese leadership.

U.S. Takes Soft Approach

U.S. Defense officials were careful not to give any hint of politicking when discussing the Pentagon’s report on China’s military power on Aug. 16. A senior defense official, when briefing reporters, pointed out that the publication is “very factual in nature … the tone of the report and our efforts in writing the report is to be very, very straightforward, factual, descriptive and analytical …”

The report has even been criticized as too soft. After being embargoed for five months by the administration, and having its title changed by Congress (from “Military Power of the People’s Republic of China” to “Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China”), defense experts say it hedges far too much and lacks substance in addressing the implications of its own findings.

“News was that the NSC [National Security Council] thought the information was too provocative,” said Michael Mazza, senior research associate with the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), in an interview with The Epoch Times.

Updates by the Department of Defense adopt a similarly conciliatory tone. Headlines read “Gates Urges Positive U.S.-China Military Relations,” and “U.S. Wants Renewed Military Contacts with China.”

“It seems the administration is still struggling to come to terms with its China policy,” Mr. Mazza says.

After oscillating between a soft and firm line on China over the last several months, the United States has recently been at pains to project dovish intentions.

“The United States has committed itself … to the pursuit of a positive, cooperative, and comprehensive relationship with China,” a senior defense official said at the press briefing.

The recent release of the military report appears along the lines of the “strategic reassurance” policy, a pillar of the Obama administration’s foreign policy, which seeks to accommodate Beijing and provide assurance that the United States is a partner.

The CCP may take the United States’ more conciliatory tone, however, as an opening for more aggressive rhetoric and behavior, according to the AEI’s Mazza.

Nationalist Tendencies

After the United States announced its intentions to carry out war games with South Korea in international waters in the Yellow Sea, which commenced on Aug. 16, the response from nationalist elements in China was strong.

Huanqiu, printed by the official Party mouthpiece People’s Daily, is leading the way in hawkish rhetoric. An article published on Aug. 13 ran with headline “Thoroughly Abandon Illusions About the U.S.! The Biggest Obstacle to China’s Rise is the U.S.”

The contents of the piece, which ran with no byline, upheld the bluster. The article argued that America sending ships to the Yellow Sea is a direct provocation to China, despite whatever statements have been made to the contrary. “In doing this, the United States is publicly declaring that China is a significant enemy,” the article says in its first paragraph.

The sensitivity may be related to the Communist Party’s expanded definition of its “core interests,” a phrase which has until now been used to refer mostly to Xinjiang and Tibet. The CCP now wants to include the Yellow Sea and the South China Sea in its manifesto of core interests, according to an analysis by Willy Lam of the Jamestown Foundation .

With the Party having extended China’s core interests into international waters—and to the whole of the Korean Peninsula, according to South Korean media—the United States’ encroachments can only be seen in the most unforgiving light: “Since the Pentagon insists on making China its military rival, China is only left with becoming a qualified opponent: We must let the U.S. know that its strategic mistakes must come at a great price,” the Huanqiu editorial rails.