US Appeals Court Denies Emergency Request to Block ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

US Appeals Court Denies Emergency Request to Block ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban
A California-legal AR-15 style rifle is displayed for sale at the Crossroads of the West Gun Show at the Orange County Fairgrounds in Costa Mesa, Calif., on June 5, 2021. (Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images)
Jack Phillips
4/19/2023
Updated:
4/19/2023
0:00

A federal appeals court ruled to keep an Illinois state-wide “assault weapons” ban intact by denying a business owner who said the ban violates the U.S. Constitution’s 2nd Amendment.

The Chicago-based Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday denied a request (pdf) for an emergency injunction by Robert Bevis, a gun store owner in Naperville, to block the ban while it considers his case. He is appealing an earlier ruling by U.S. District Judge Virginia Kendall issued (pdf) earlier this year.
Bevis filed a petition for the emergency injunction in March and asked the 7th Circuit to block the ban for himself and others who might be impacted by the law, signed by Democrat Gov. J.B. Pritzker earlier this year. The bill banned a number of weapons and magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, while requiring that anyone who owns such a gun register it with the Illinois State Police.

The legislation to ban such weapons was introduced in January, coming months after a shooting at a Fourth of July parade in Highland Park that left seven dead and dozens more injured. No motive was established by law enforcement in the mass shooting, and police later arrested a suspect in the case, Robert Eugene Crimo III.

Bevis’s lawyers have wrote that his business, Law Weapons & Supply, had suffered because of the ban. His store also may have to close down due to the new law, they wrote.

“The challenged laws ban arms commonly possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes. Heller’s central holding is that a categorical ban on arms held by law-abiding citizens is unconstitutional,” his lawyers wrote to the appeals court last month, referring to the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling on District of Columbia v. Heller in which the high court found that a District of Columbia law regulating gun ownership to be unconstitutional.

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker gives a COVID-19 update in the Blue Room at the Thompson Center in Chicago on Feb. 9, 2022. (Tyler LaRiviere/Chicago Sun-Times via AP)
Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker gives a COVID-19 update in the Blue Room at the Thompson Center in Chicago on Feb. 9, 2022. (Tyler LaRiviere/Chicago Sun-Times via AP)

They added: “One would suppose that the district court would apply the Heller test or, failing that, at least explain why it believed the test is not applicable. The district court did neither. It erred when it simply ignored Heller’s central holding. Nowhere in its opinion does it apply, or even acknowledge, Heller’s holding in this regard.” It further contended that Bevis’s constitutional rights were violated.

It came after Kendall ruled that Bevis and others suffer a “minimal” financial “burden and loss of access to effective firearms” with the bank. “On the other side, Illinois and Naperville compellingly argue their laws protect public safety by removing particularly dangerous weapons from circulation. The protection of public safety is also unmistakably a ‘public interest,’ one both laws further,” she added.

Kendall further argued that “because assault weapons are particularly dangerous weapons ... their regulation accords with history and tradition.” But such weapons, Bevis’s lawyers argued in their petition to the 7th Circuit, are “commonly possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes,” and therefore cannot  be banned because they are “not unusual.”

In explaining why he wanted to sue, Bevis told a local media outlet that he believes the ban violates Americans’ 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear firearms.

“I wake up one morning, I come into work and find out that they are going to ban assault weapons the following week,” Bevis told a local NBC affiliate earlier in 2023. “It’s unconstitutional. Our Second Amendment provides us a right to keep and bear arms, and this is taking away,” Bevis said.

His challenge is one of many that seek to overturn the statewide law.

“We are doing this to help the whole state of Illinois. We are doing this to try to defend our rights,” Bevis said.

According to an FAQ of the law, “No, Illinois residents cannot purchase an AR 15 or assault weapon beginning January 11, 2023 unless subject to one of the narrow exemptions.” And the FAQ says the law bans “a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition for long guns and more than 15 rounds of ammunition for handguns; or any combination of parts from which a device described can be assembled.”
Jack Phillips is a breaking news reporter with 15 years experience who started as a local New York City reporter. Having joined The Epoch Times' news team in 2009, Jack was born and raised near Modesto in California's Central Valley. Follow him on X: https://twitter.com/jackphillips5
twitter
Related Topics