Solomon Islands Playing US, China Off Against Each Other: Diplomacy Expert

By Daniel Y. Teng
Daniel Y. Teng
Daniel Y. Teng
Daniel Y. Teng is based in Sydney. He focuses on national affairs including federal politics, COVID-19 response, and Australia-China relations. Got a tip? Contact him at
May 2, 2022 Updated: May 2, 2022

The contentious security deal between the Solomon Islands and Beijing is a sign that the Pacific nation is exploiting “Great Power” competition between China and democratic allies in the region, according to a diplomacy expert.

Joseph Siracusa, adjunct professor of international diplomacy at Curtin University, said smaller nations will play “small power politics” when wedged between bigger countries attempting to gain influence over a region.

At the same time, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been leveraging its Belt and Road Initiative to carve out a stake in the South Pacific by offering infrastructure deals to many developing countries.

“What the Chinese are doing is classic British diplomacy in the 19th century and the United States in the early 20th century between Britain and France,” Siracusa told The Epoch Times. “It’s about leveraging money and finances to get a foothold.”

One of the most famous examples of the Great Power competition was the “Great Game,” which occurred in Afghanistan and Central Asia during the 1800s between the British and Russian Empire—both countries manoeuvred diplomatically and politically for more than a century to fend off a possible invasion from the other.

According to Siracusa, the same scenario is playing out in the Solomon Islands.

“All this changed when the leadership in Honiara withdrew its support from Taipei in favour of Beijing; that’s the constant here,” he said. “If it hadn’t switched leaders or loyalties, I’m sure Beijing would not have come calling with their chequebook.”

Embattled Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare has been defiant in his decision to sign the security deal while also giving assurances to Australian and U.S. delegations that the security deal won’t result in a military base being established in the region.

“When Australia signed up to AUKUS, we did not become theatrical or hysterical about the implications this would have for us,” Sogavare said in a fiery address to the Solomon Islands Parliament on April 29. “We respected Australia’s decision.”

According to a leaked draft of the “Security Cooperation between the Solomon Islands and the People’s Republic of China (PRC),” Beijing would be able to dispatch police, troops, weapons, and even naval ships—with the consent of the Solomon Islands—to “protect the safety of Chinese personnel and major projects in the Solomon Islands.”

Experts have said a fully implemented security deal would lead to geopolitical tensions akin to the South China Sea.

The Solomon Islands was the site of extensive fighting during World War II—resulting in more than 7,000 casualties to the Allied forces—because of its critical position and influence over vital sea lanes.

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison has warned of the challenges of competing with Beijing for influence in the region.

“There are 20 Pacific Island foreign nations. … There are 20 areas which we’re looking to ensure we counter that (CCP) influence,” Morrison told Radio 2GB on April 26.

“We’re the only country in the world to have an embassy in every single one of those Pacific island nations. So it’s an area which is tightly contested, and we’ve always been heavily forward-leaning. But we’re dealing with the Chinese government that doesn’t play by the same rules.”

Daniel Y. Teng
Daniel Y. Teng is based in Sydney. He focuses on national affairs including federal politics, COVID-19 response, and Australia-China relations. Got a tip? Contact him at