Special counsel Robert Mueller’s press conference should be dubbed “Much Ado About Nothing.” In it, Mueller did all he could to authorize the House to initiate impeachment proceedings against the president.
However, despite his intended purpose, his presser did nothing more than to solidify the long-held belief among many that Mueller has a personal animus against the president, and that his investigation was nothing more than a politically motivated witch-hunt intended to oust President Donald Trump.
“I have not spoken publicly during our investigation. I am speaking today because our investigation is complete. The Attorney General has made the report on our investigation largely public. And we are formally closing the Special Counsel’s Office. As well, I am resigning from the Department of Justice and returning to private life.
In light of these admissions, what possible purpose is there for him to make a “few remarks” about the results of the investigation? He had two years to investigate; he prepared his written findings and submitted his report to Attorney General William Barr, who subsequently released it (with necessary redactions). Why, then, would he find it necessary to insert himself into the investigation or supplement the very report that he asserts should be allowed to speak for itself?
The obvious reason is political in nature.
“As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that. We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime. ...
In addition, Mueller’s comments during the recent press conference (and part two of his report) possibly ran afoul of several policies, the first of which is the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) longstanding protocol of not releasing negative information about people who aren’t indicted. Mueller didn’t recommend indictment in his report, which should have ended the investigation relative to the president.
Rather than riding off into the sunset after completing his report, Mueller utilized the recent press conference as a means to improperly supplement his findings by implying that the president committed a crime and by “advising” Congress to utilize a different “process” to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing (given the policy against indicting a sitting president).
“First, the opinion explicitly permits the investigation of a sitting President because it is important to preserve evidence while memories are fresh and documents are available. Among other things, that evidence could be used if there were co-conspirators who could now be charged.
Mueller’s comments during his press conference were not necessary to inform the public of the prosecutor’s (Mueller’s) action and didn’t serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, as required by the Rule 3.8. Rather, they were seemingly meant to hurt Trump and to encourage Democrats to impeach him.
Mueller’s press conference was nothing more than a ruse to supplement his “failed” report. There was no reason for him to make any additional comments. His report was complete and had been released to the public. He didn’t recommend any additional indictments and his role should have ended then and there.
By injecting himself into the investigation, unilaterally “supplementing” his report by way of a prewritten statement during a press conference, and by implying or “pushing” Congress to initiate impeachment proceedings, Mueller’s animus against the president was clearly visible to all Americans, and he came across as grossly partisan and ineffective.
Friends Read Free