Articles published in prestigious science journals like Nature and The Lancet were used to lend weight and authority to the natural origins theory of the virus. These articles, signed by a small group of scientists, were then used by corporate media to relentlessly label any theory involving the Wuhan Institute of Virology as conspiracy theories.
But were these scientific journals actually part of the conspiracy?
Why did The Lancet publish an op-ed pushing the natural origins theory when it was widely known that its author had funded and collaborated with the Wuhan lab?
Why did Nature magazine place disclaimers on historical articles that lent credibility to a lab leak theory? Why did Nature magazine then quietly remove disclaimers on certain crucial articles after the lab leak theory finally gained material acceptance and credibility?
Did this small group of scientists specifically ignore scientific facts in order to promote these narratives?
Welcome to Truth over News with Jeff Carlson and Hans Mahncke.