Emergency Hearing on North Korean Refugees in China

March 10, 2012 Updated: March 12, 2012
Epoch Times Photo
From L to R, T. Kumar, Director, International Advocacy for Amnesty International USA; Greg Scarlatoiu, Executive Director, the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea; and Michael Horowitz, Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute testifies before the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, March 5. They said that China's forced repatriation of North Korean refugees violates International law. (Gary Feuerberg/ The Epoch Times)

WASHINGTON—The Congressional Executive Commission on China (CECC) held an emergency hearing to draw attention to the over 30 North Korean refugees who had fled to China and are facing the imminent danger of repatriation. If returned, they face certain persecution, torture, and even execution.

“The international community—especially the United Nations, the Obama Administration, and the U.S. Congress—must insist that China at long last honor its treaty obligations, end its egregious practice of [forced return to North Korea], or be exposed as hypocrites,” said Rep. Chris Smith, Chairman of the CECC, March 5 in his opening remarks.

A finding from the CECC Oct. 2011 annual report said “Chinese law enforcement agencies have deployed hundreds of officials to locate and forcibly repatriate North Korean refugees.” The Chinese work with North Korean police to engage in reported “manhunts,” throughout China, including remote areas. In addition, Chinese authorities offer bounties to citizens who turn in North Koreans, and “fine, detain, or imprison” those who render humanitarian assistance.

The situation is made more critical at this time for North Korean defectors apprehended recently in China. North Korea’s new leader, Kim Jong Un announced in December the “exterminate three generations” policy, where the family and relatives should be executed if just one member of the family fled North Korea during the 100-day mourning period following the death of his father, Kim Jong Il.

“Under such atmosphere, it is as clear as daylight that the refugees will be subject to an exemplary execution or imprisonment in the concentration camp for political prisoners, immediately after being taken to North Korea,” said Suzanne Scholte, Chairman and Founding Member of the North Korea Freedom Coalition.

Graphic Testimony

The commission heard oral testimony from a North Korean mother and daughter who have undergone years of fear, starvation, beatings, pain, and suffering. Ms. Songhwa Han described the arrest of her husband who made a trip to China in order to bring back a sack of rice for his family, which was weak from starvation. He died while in prison from starvation and the severe punishment he received, she said. With hungry stomachs, Han didn’t want to see her family starve and so she took her two daughters and crossed “waist-high currents of the Tumen River.”

They eventually successfully escaped from North Korea, but had to live in constant fear in China for almost 10 years, during which times, they were forcibly repatriated four times. She described a North Korean work camp where she worked from 5 in the morning until late at night, and given only a “fist-size corn-riceball to eat. She said they were required to attend self-criticism group meetings till 11 p.m.

“For the crime of betraying the nation, in the [National Security Agency] prisons, the North Korean refugee men who were forcibly repatriated were beaten with steel pipes, and countless people died from the beatings inflicted on them where arms and legs were broken. I myself was beaten in the head for the crime of having gone over to China, and I was beaten so severely that my skull still has pieces of bone embedded in my head.”

Han’s daughter, Jinhye Jo, described the Chinese police and security officials they encountered as “obsessed with searching and arresting North Korean defectors.” She said the human traffickers “did not see a mother with two children but rather a source of money-making.”

Jo said she witnessed with her own eyes in a North Korean prison the abuse of a North Korean woman who was pregnant with a baby conceived with a Chinese man. The head national security agent “cussed profanities at her, yelling at this woman that she was a ‘bitch who carried Chinese seed.’ He then proceed to torture and beat her with steel hooks by hitting her on the side and the head, and forcing her to sit and stand repeated for 500 times, until she collapsed.”

Scholte said Kim Jong Il’s “racist contempt for the Chinese people was evident in his ordering of his border guards to beat the bellies of pregnant North Korean females who had been repatriated because their unborn babies were half Chinese.”

Epoch Times Photo
Suzanne Scholte, President, Defense Forum Foundation, gives testimony before the Congressional-Executive Commission on China on the urgent crisis facing North Korean refugees recently arrested in China. In the background, Songhwa Han, former North Korean refugee detained in China, repatriated to North Korea, described life in the prison. Both spoke on Capitol Hill, March 5. (Gary Feuerberg/The Epoch Times)


Denial of Refugee Status

China denies the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) access to the Chinese-North Korean border and to North Korean refugees in northeast China to set up a screening process. The CECC October 2011 annual report stated that the “inability of the UNHCR to access North Koreans seeking asylum in China makes it difficult to determine the reasons behind North Korean defections and the concern they have over forced repatriation.”

Greg Scarlatoiu, Executive Director, Committee for Human Rights in North Korea (HRNK), said China is violating the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol, which it signed in 1982 that prohibits a state from returning a refugee where his life or freedom would be threatened. China has also ratified human rights agreements, including the Convention Against Torture, “which prohibits the return of persons to states where they could be subjected to torture, ” Scarlatoiu said.

It outrages Congressman Smith and human rights organizations that China denies it has legal obligations, when China states that these North Koreans are “illegal economic migrants” and are therefore not refugees. Instead, China enforces the 1986 agreement with North Korea to prevent “illegal border crossings,” said Scarlatoiu.

T. Kumar, Amnesty International USA, cited a later bilateral agreement in July 1998 between China and North Korea for enforcing movement across the border. Kumar’s information came from a White Paper published by a South Korean think tank.

Roberta Cohen, Chair, The Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, was unable to attend the hearing in person. Her written testimony listed some of the reasons that North Koreans fleeing their homeland fit the definition of a refugee: “It is well known that in their own country North Koreans suffer persecution if they express or even appear to hold political views unacceptable to the authorities, listen to foreign broadcasts, watch South Korean DVDs, practice their own religious beliefs, or try to leave the country.”

Repatriating North Korean defectors is “effectively a death sentence,” said Congressman Ed Royce (R-Calif.) at the hearing. “Leaving North Korea is considered a crime and punishable by execution or worked to death in the gulags,” he said.

Royce recalled testimony at a previous hearing when a Mr. Kim, who had been in prison for providing humanitarian assistance to North Korean refugees, “saw North Korean defectors beaten to a pulp by [Chinese] prison guards before they were sent back to North Korea.”

In May 2011, Amnesty International released satellite imagery that show the labor camps and other penal facilities expanded significantly to an estimated population of 200,000. That fact alone should be evidence that those who cross the border have a “well-founded fear of persecution,” Cohen wrote.

The most compelling case for not repatriating North Koreans, writes Cohen, is that although they may not have been refugees when they left the country because they were starving, they have genuine fears now of persecution and punishment upon return.

Several witnesses said the U.S. should increase the pressure on UNHCR to protect the North Korean refugees and challenge China’s refusal to allow access to them. Michael Horowitz, Hudson Institute, revived a recommendation from former Senator Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) and Frank Wolf (R-Va.) for the UNHCR to invoke its right under Article XVI of the 1995 China-UNHCR treaty to take China to binding arbitration over the issue of China’s refusal to allow access to refugees and its unlawful roundups and refoulements of refugees to North Korean authorities, who are known to arrest, torture, and in some cases, execute them.