DOJ Prosecutors Looking Into Controversial Obama-Era Uranium One Deal

Deal gave Russia control over a Canadian company mining uranium in US. Despite assurances, the uranium has left the US.
December 21, 2017 Updated: December 30, 2017

Department of Justice prosecutors have requested information from FBI agents about an investigation they conducted into the so-called Uranium One deal, NBC News reported on Dec. 21.

DOJ prosecutors are currently establishing whether a special counsel is needed to look into the controversial deal that gave Russia control over Canadian mining company Uranium One, which at the time controlled 20 percent of the uranium supply licensed for mining in the United States.

By giving Russia control over a significant portion of American uranium supplies, the deal created a potential national security risk. Despite the assurances of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to Congress that the uranium mined by Uranium One would not leave the United States, it did.

Epoch Times Photo
A radioactive warning sign hangs on fencing around the Anfield’s Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill on October 27, 2017, outside Ticaboo, Utah. Anfield with is in partnership with the Russian firm Uranium One, and bought the mill from Uranium One in 2015. (George Frey/Getty Images)

NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that uranium transfers to Canada as well as Europe were approved by the Obama administration. From either destination, it could have made its way to other countries, potentially including adversaries of the United States in pursuit of nuclear weapons.

Chairman of the Senate judiciary committee Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) has called on the DOJ to appoint a special counsel to look into the agreement.

Epoch Times Photo
Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Chuck Grassley in Washington on Sept. 20, 2016. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Russia’s nuclear energy agency, Rosatom, acquired the controlling stake in Uranium One in 2010.

Because uranium, when enriched, is a key component for nuclear weapons, the deal required a national security review by the Committee on Foreign Investments (CFIUS) in the United States.

The State Department is part of CFIUS and was required to give its approval for the deal. At the time of the review and the approval given by the State Department, Hillary Clinton was serving as secretary of state.

During the time the deal was under review, payments made their way from Uranium One and Russian officials to the Clintons.

During the time the deal was under review, payments made their way from Uranium One and Russian officials to the Clintons.

The payments were detailed by The New York Times in a 2015 exposé, in which the payments made to the Clinton Foundation as well as former President Bill Clinton were detailed.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations to the Clinton Foundation, totaling $2.35 million.

According to The New York Times, those donations were not disclosed by the Clintons, despite a deal that Hillary Clinton reached with the Obama administration before being appointed as secretary of state that they would disclose all donors.

Epoch Times Photo
Former President Bill Clinton delivers a speech during the annual Clinton Global Initiative in New York City, on Sept. 21, 2016. (Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)

At the same time that the security review was being conducted, Bill Clinton received a speaking fee of $500,000 from a Kremlin-linked investment bank.

In 2006, the Clinton Foundation had already received a $31.3 million donation from Canadian billionaire Frank Giustra, owner of mining company UrAsia, which merged with another mining company in 2007 to become Uranium One.

Giustra still serves on the board of directors of the Clinton Foundation.

The FBI had also uncovered evidence of a sophisticated Russian bribery plot to get the controversial deal approved.

Citing FBI and court documents, The Hill reported on Oct. 17 that the Russian officials had engaged in “bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States.”

Epoch Times Photo
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton makes a concession speech after being defeated by Republican president-elect Donald Trump in New York on Nov. 9, 2016. (JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)

The FBI also had a witness who possessed documents showing that Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the United States to benefit the Clinton Foundation, sources told The Hill.

An FBI informant in the case named William Campbell had gathered evidence on “millions of dollars in bribes and kickbacks, plus extortion and money laundering,” the Hill reported based on a review of documents provided by Campbell.

Campbell had been prevented by then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch from testifying before Congress on his findings. In October, the DOJ lifted the gag order on the informant, allowing him to speak to congressional panels.

Epoch Times Photo
Former U.S. President Barack Obama speaks following a meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch (L) in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on July 19, 2016. (MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)

The FBI director at the time was Robert Mueller, who is now the special counsel investigating the allegations of Russian meddling in the 2016 elections.

A leaked diplomatic cable obtained by Wikileaks shows that Mueller had personally flown to Moscow in early 2009 to deliver a 10-gram sample of highly enriched uranium. The transfer of the strip from the FBI director to Russian officials was conducted on the tarmac, according to the cable, which was sent by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The sample had been requested by Russia following the seizure of highly enriched uranium in Georgia in 2006 that had been transferred to U.S. custody.

Follow Jasper on Twitter: @JasperFakkert