Police Delete ‘Non-Crime Hate Incident’ Report for Conservative MP’s Social Media Post

West Mercia Police confirmed the social media messages did not meet the definition of an ‘incident’ as defined by the National Standard for Incident Recording.
Police Delete ‘Non-Crime Hate Incident’ Report for Conservative MP’s Social Media Post
Undated photo issued by UK Parliament of Rachel Maclean, the Conservative MP for Redditch. (PA)
Victoria Friedman
3/28/2024
Updated:
3/29/2024
0:00

Police have deleted a “non-crime hate incident” record of a Conservative MP, following a challenge from the Free Speech Union (FSU).

West Mercia Police confirmed on Wednesday that after a review, they had deleted the non-crime hate incident from their systems of Rachel Maclean, the MP for Redditch.

A police spokesperson said: “We can confirm that after seeking advice that a social media message previously recorded as a non-crime hate incident did not meet the definition of an ‘incident’ as defined by the National Standard for Incident Recording.

“As a result, the ‘hate incident’ and personal details have now been removed from the West Mercia Police systems.”

Writing on social media platform X in December 2023, Ms. Maclean criticised the Green Party for selecting Melissa Poulton, a male who identifies as a transgender woman, to stand in the neighbouring Worcester constituency.

Police recorded the gender-critical comments after receiving complaints about the post.

The FSU was founded in 2020 by Toby Young and is a non-partisan, mass membership organisation which defends freedom of speech.

Acknowledging the victory on Wednesday, the body said, “The FSU has succeeded in getting a non-crime hate incident (NCHI) previously recorded against Tory MP and Deputy Party Chairwomen Rachel Maclean deleted from her record.”

‘Total Distraction from Policing’

Reacting to the news, Ms. Maclean said on X: “I am pleased to see this ridiculous ‘hate incident’ has been thrown out and all records removed from police database. What a total distraction from policing.

“I’m grateful for [the Free Speech Union’s] support fighting this.”

“I will not stop speaking up on behalf of all women and men who feel gaslighted by those who would deny the biological reality and scientific truth that is staring them in the face.

“While being respectful to all individuals undergoing processes, we must also be clear about facts,” she added.

Non-Crime Hate Incidents

A non-crime hate incident is where perceived hate incidents are reported to police, despite not being a crime.

They were introduced following the 1999 inquiry into the 1993 murder of Stephen Lawrence as part of a recommendation for police Codes of Practice to create “a comprehensive system of reporting and recording of all racist incidents and crimes.”

According to the College of Policing, the recording of non-crime hate incidents has expanded to cover all “protected characteristics” covered by legislation in England and Wales, including race, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, and disability.

“This data is vital for helping the police to understand where they must target resources to prevent serious crimes that may later occur,” the College of Policing says.

There is no such thing as a “hate crime” law in England. Rather, there are several pieces of legislation under which people can be prosecuted for offences toward people with protected characteristics, such as the Public Order Act 1986, the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, or the Communications Act 2003.

Scotland’s Hate Crime Law

Meanwhile, in Scotland, a new hate crime law—The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act—comes into effect on April 1.

The law creates new “stirring up of hatred offences” for protected characteristics, such as “age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, and transgender identity.”

Free speech campaigners and MPs have branded the legislation as “dangerous.”

Stuart Waiton, senior lecturer in sociology and criminology at Abertay University, told The Epoch Times last month that the “woolly language and the implications of a bill that could see people arrested for muttering ‘incorrect’ statements in their own home are of the utmost seriousness.”

“Unfortunately, this bill once again demonstrates the dangerous nature of the Scottish government, where a bill the public oppose is forced upon them against their will in a manner that reflects the elitist, almost aristocratic nature of the court-like system in Holyrood,” he said.

PA Media and Owen Evans contributed to this report.