India Calls Dolphins ‘Non-Human Persons’, Bans In-Captivity Shows

Give feedback
Print Friendly

"Mentioning Dolphins as 'non-human persons' gives huge impetus to the Animal Rights discourse in the world. It's a great statement,"

Avinash Basker, Legal Consultant, Wildlife Protection Society of India

India’s Ministry of Environment and Forests, has banned public entertainment shows by captive dolphins calling it morally unacceptable.

In a statement by the Central Zoo Authority, the Government of India has advised all state governments in the country to reject any proposal to establish a dolphinarium “by any person / persons, organizations, government agencies, private or public enterprises that involves the import [and] capture of cetacean species to [use] for commercial entertainment, private or public exhibition and [other] interaction purposes whatsoever.”

Avinash Basker, Legal Consultant at the Wildlife Protection Society of India said: “As far as Dolphins in captivity are concerned, it’s a great step. Dolphins hunting is illegal in India and those in captivity in the country would have been captured elsewhere in the world. Thus, it’s good for Dolphins globally.” 

Basker, however, mentions that there are other challenges about Dolphin Conservation in the country. “There are sporadic reports on Dolphin meat consumption in southern Indian states. The Extent of this problem is … not known as the fishing industry is not well regulated here.”

In India, Dolphins are protected under the Wild Life (Protection) Act of 1972. The Indian Government has declared Dolphins from the Ganges river as its national aquatic animal with a view to protect the endangered species.

The statement released by the Central Zoo Authority mentions that cetaceans (marine mammals) cannot survive in captivity. “Cetaceans in general are highly intelligent and sensitive, and various scientists who have researched dolphin behavior have suggested that the unusually high intelligence compared to other animals means that dolphins should be seen as ‘non-human persons’ and as such should have their own specific rights and it is morally unacceptable to keep them captive for entertainment purposes.”

Basker mentions that more countries need to come up with such policies to prevent more Dolphins from being captured. “Mentioning Dolphins as ‘non-human persons’ gives huge impetus to the Animal Rights discourse in the world. It’s a great statement,” he says.

Basker believes that the essence of this statement is that keeping Dolphins under captivity is cruel. “Under the aegis of the Wildlife Protection Act of India, Dolphins are protected as are any other species. By mentioning them as non-human persons, the government has probably tried to heighten their status under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act of 1960.”


Give feedback
Print Friendly
  • Jone K

    Way to go India! It is impressive that the Indian culture and the Indian people are more civilized, more educated, more informed, and humane than the Chinese. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is wacky without any scientific basis; whereas, Indian ayurvedic medicine makes logical sense the more I learn about it. Forget the Chinese! It’s wiser to study up on the Indian culture and people!
    Which country is next to be on the platform with India?

    • JayJay

      yeah way to go India real impressive but maybe this should have be fixed first. http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/In+child+death+capital+India+5,000+die+every+day/1/89482.html

      • veggiedude

        True, they need to fix that and it will take a great effort of financial help, logistics and a lot of time to get done. On the other hand, doing the dolphin thing costs virtually zero finance, zero logistics and zero time. So there is no excuse for others to follow suit.

      • ByronSmith

        Why are they are in competition?


Top