Jodi Arias Says She Won’t Use Twitter For a While


Jodi Arias, who has remained active on Twitter while in jail, announced that she won’t be using the social media service for a while.

Arias has reportedly been using the service with the help of friends and family members, to whom she conveys what she wants tweeted.

She has a relatively popular account, with over 79,000 followers.

Arias said that as of January 30, she’s not going to tweet for a while, calling it a “temporary” but “probably long-term” move.

“I’m thinking of giving control 2 someone else. Hopefully, they’ll tweet updates & cont. the quote trend, but that will be @ their discretion,” she said. “Whoever takes over this acct. 4 the time being will NOT be representing my views, opinions, philosophies, beliefs, or creeds–but their own.”

She added that she is “crushed with mail.” To anyone sent her mail but doesn’t receive a reply, “know that I hear U & feel your love. I’m humbled,” she said.

Arias was convicted of murdering her boyfriend Travis Alexander but the sentencing phase of the trial ended without a unanimous decision from the jury, prompting a new jury to get picked.

Jury selection begins on March 17.


  • Chiron

    Snip: “Arias said that as of January 30, she’s not going to tweet for a while, calling it a “temporary” but “probably long-term” move.”

    After Dr. Nick is finished with her, in about 13 years, she’s going to stop being an oxygen thief on this planet “temporary but probably forever”.

    Methinks that Nurmi and Wilma have finally figured out that they can’t claim over-exposure in the media on the internet if their star client Hodi is the person most responsible for publicity in this case.

    • keepsitrealx10

      Spot on! While it is only my theory but maybe just maybe as a ward of the state all tweets might be admissible. If not in the sentence phase but in the appeal phase.

  • http://trial-by-media.wikispaces.com/ George Barwood

    A step-by-step guide I have been working on that demonstrates how there was no case against Jodi Arias. The evidence shows that she killed her ex-boyfriend Travis Alexander in self-defense after he lost his temper just as she was about to leave, the standard trigger for domestic violence. The unsequestered, death penalty jury were likely influenced by the prejudicial one-sided coverage by HLN and other Time-Warner subsidiaries which televised the trial live in a sensationalised way.
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/JodiAriasOpen/permalink/505161279602319/

    • Chiron

      I don’t know what you’re smoking? If your plan was to enhance your deductive reasoning skills it’s not working.

    • TrialJunky

      LMAO. You can’t fix stupid.

    • Jeff G.

      George thats the best you can do with your retirement?!..sorry dude! :-(

    • keepsitrealx10

      Oops! You forgot the trial was live. The only evidence of Travis as an evil abuser was that of a known liar. She said it but the evidence said otherwise.

    • QuaglinosPlaceOrMabels

      Just as she was about to leave?? She had already left a couple months prior, moved 1000 miles away. If that was such a trigger, why didn’t he go hunt her down after she left Arizona? Why are there no text messages, emails or recorded phone conversations of Travis threatening her if she didn’t return to him? Or begging her to come back?
      Why, just a week before his murder (and one day before the grandfather’s gun was “stolen”) did he call her a sociopath, a liar, and the worse thing that ever happened to him, and tell her to leave him alone? THAT was the trigger for domestic violence that she inflicted on him. Self-defense my a$$!!

    • wolfsden6lynn

      I’m sure one of the FIRST things Nurmi did, was interview family and friends of the jurors’, to make SURE NONE of them cheated on the Judge’s Admonitions.
      Besides, If the four who did NOT vote for the DP had been watching the news
      coverage…THEY would have voted Death, as well.

    • keepsitrealx10

      So another trys to gain recognition on the back of a killer.

  • Chiron

    The photo above, which looks like a slab of flesh with glasses, will be one of Hodi’s highlights of the next 13 years or so of the rest of her life.

  • Ste Margarita

    Jodi was nothing more than a piece of meat for this sex fiend… when Jodi dropped his precious camera – he snapped… he needed to kill Jodi to protect his dirty sex secrets… especially the pedophilia.

    God Bless you Jodi… you will be vindicated.

    • QuaglinosPlaceOrMabels

      “he needed to kill Jodi to protect his dirty sex secrets… especially the
      pedophilia.”

      And yet…he’s the one who’s dead. If you really believe that a 200 pound
      man couldn’t overpower and kill a 120 pound woman, IF he was the one who in fact initiated the fight in the first place, you’re terribly naive.

      Remember stabby said he “body slammed” her to the ground and knocked the
      wind out of her? And yet miraculously she managed to get her bearings, roll
      over, stand up, high tail it down the hallway, run into the adjacent closet,
      slam the door, make it to the back end of the closet, step up on a shelf and
      retrieve the gun…all with enough of a head start that Travis at this point was
      just coming through that closed door. If she was indeed that far ahead of him,
      the floorplan of his master suite would have allowed him to see her entering the
      closet from the opposite door leading to the bathroom.

      The only reason he couldn’t overpower her right off the bat was because she
      ambushed him in the shower with the knife. Surprise attack, he had no idea what
      hit him. Advantage stabby.

      • keepsitrealx10

        Amazing to me that anyone would believe the pedophile lie. It was so absurd that Jodi tried to forge letters to find some sort of evidence for her lies. It is a terrible injustice that the defendant has all of the rights and the victim has none as in zero. No right to a speedy trial… any lie the defendant wants to use to assassinate the victim’s character is allowed even though there is no evidence or collaboration. The scales are touching the ground on the defendant’s side. Don’t misunderstand I believe every defendant should have a fair trial, Jodi has had a 2 + million trial and every allowance that could possibly be given, in fact, she has had a first class high dollar defense one she could NEVER have been able to afford. . However, there needs to be a truth line drawn in the sand. The victims can not speak for themselves – the prosecutor and the evidence is the only voice, so why is it permissible for a defendant to introduce anything and everything into a defense even when there is no evidence or proof? You can not enter into evidence so many things just because it might not shed a good light on a defendant, regardless of the back up but you can legally slaughter a victim again and again and again and none of it has to be true. Just because Jodi the Killer said it just doesn’t make it true. You can not make an apple into an orange.

      • keepsitrealx10

        I have had the wind knocked out of me a few times. A few of them with a horse being stupid over me. When it happens you don;t jump up anywhere or move fast to anywhere. Period. It is not possible no matter how much your adrenaline is going. Anyone who says otherwise is just spitting into the wind.

        • QuaglinosPlaceOrMabels

          Right?! And–while I can’t speak from personal experience–I would imagine the same would be true for anyone who got a knife plunged into their chest in a surprise attack. She impaired him so severely with that first blow, he didn’t stand a chance against her, no matter how much he outweighed her.
          Sidebar: (Ha, remember those??) I love horses but that’s always been one of my biggest fears! Ouch! :(

        • Chiron

          It’s a vulture, it’s a plane! No, it’s Super Stabby!!
          Yet again!

    • wolfsden6lynn

      You’re kidding..right? It is obvious you did NOT watch the trial. Forensics went through TA’s computer, cell phone, DVD’s, cubbords, closets, and drawers, with a fine tooth comb..BEFORE Jodi was ever arrested. He was NOT a ‘pedophile’. The ONLY mention of it was by HER..a proven pathological liar, and someone who needed to cover her a**, for committing an act of vicious, pre-meditated murder.
      The ONLY person ‘dirty’ in all of this is Ariass, herself.

    • keepsitrealx10

      The sheep following the she wolf. Why did she drag him back to the shower and then try to erase evidence? Why didn’t she call the police? Why did she lie? Why didn’t she go to Utah but instead turned off her phone before getting to Arizona ? Why would an innocent be concerned about a car color attracting attention? Why was this the only trip she took gas cans on? Why did she change her hair color? As she stated in an interview she did not see how a neighbor could recognize her as she was always a blonde. Why in the sex tape did she say she liked the fantasy? It is only her word that her supporters believe as the victim can only speak through the trail of evidence his killer left behind.

    • TrialJunky

      And somehow Jodi knew that she would drop the camera (really, Jodi? That was the best you could do?) and that Travis would “snap”, so several days earlier she decided to steal her grandfather’s gun to protect herself from her psychic vision? Ste Margarita, you must be drinking too many of your namesakes. Either that, or you are just looking to get a rise out of us. Either way, your post gave me a good, hearty laugh. Thanks.

      • QuaglinosPlaceOrMabels

        Her story was so implausible with so many holes in it, it’s astounding that there are people out there who actually bought it. But I agree, it is rather amusing to hear their rationale, weak as it may be.

  • Chiron

    What will Hodi say to the court in response to her sentence of death in just a few short weeks?

    In her best Nancy Kerrigan imitation. “Why me? Whyy, Whyyy, Whyyyyyyy?”


Top