Food Companies Give Millions to Block GMO Labeling
Business association accused of laundering campaign donations
In our view it’s a clear violation.Bob Ferguson, attorney general, Washington state
You may also like
More in Fitness & Nutrition
Yoga at Home With Baby
How to Become a Better Morning Person
Laugh, Move, and Eat Your Way to a Stronger Immune System
On Nov. 5, Washington state voters will decide whether the state will become the first in the nation to require labeling for genetically engineered ingredients. Companies have spent millions to oppose the grass-roots measure, but until recently many have managed to keep their identities a secret.
The group Moms for Labeling was the first to accuse the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) of violating the state’s campaign finance disclosure laws. The group said GMA was laundering donations from the companies it represents, to protect them from consumer backlash. A judge dismissed the case on a technicality.
On Oct. 16, Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson filed another suit. His lawsuit worked.
The day after the state suit was filed, GMA disclosed the names of 34 of the nation’s best known food and beverage brands, and the financial contributions each made to a campaign to defeat voter initiative 522.
Article Continues after the discussion. Vote and comment
“In our view it’s a clear violation. It’s an important violation, particularly given the size and amount of dollars that we’re talking about,” Ferguson said at a news conference in Seattle.
$17 Million to Defeat Inititative
Contributions to the campaign to defeat I-522 so far total over $17 million. Food companies contributed over $7 million. According to the Seattle Times, opponents of Washington’s I-522 have broken the state record for raising money against a statewide initiative.
The list of companies, including PepsiCo, Campbell’s Soup, General Mills, Kellogg’s, Hershey, Nestlé USA, and others, reveals many of the same brand names that contributed to the campaign to defeat California’s labeling initiative in 2012.
According to a December 2012 directive from the GMA board, concealing the identity of campaign contributors was a strategy to fund I-522 opposition “while better shielding individual companies from attack for providing funding.”
In an Oct. 17 statement, GMA said that its voluntary disclosure of individual contributors aimed to provide Washington voters with “full transparency.”
“GMA is taking this action to allow the campaign to focus on the important issues related to the I-522 ballot proposal itself, and to put an end to unnecessary distraction and speculation about sources and amounts of funding,” the trade group said.
|Pinnacle Foods Group LLC $120,846
The J. M. Smucker Company $241,091
Rich Products Corporation $24,049
General Mills, Inc. $598,819
PepsiCo, Inc. $1,620,899
Bunge North America, Inc. $94,993
Bumble Bee Foods, LLC $36,073
Bush Brothers & Company A $16,233
Moody Dunbar, Inc. $1,804
Dean Foods Company $120,245
Kellogg Company$ 221,852
Nestlé USA, Inc. $1,052,743
ConAgra Foods $285,281
Bimbo Bakeries USA $94,693
Welch Foods, Inc. $28,859
Knouse Foods Cooperative, Inc. $14,429
Bruce Foods Corporation $3,006
Abbott Nutrition $127,459
Campbell Soup Company $265,140
Del Monte Foods Company $86,576
Sunny Delight Beverages Company$ 21,043
Shearer’s Foods, Inc. -$ 25,251
Mondelez Global LLC $144,895
Land O’Lakes, Inc. $99,803
The Coca-Cola Company $1,047,332
The Hillshire Brands Company $97,398
The Hershey Company $248,305
Hormel Foods Corporation $52,908
Clement Pappas & Company, Inc. $21,043
McCormick & Company, Inc. $102,208
Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. $55,313
Flowers Foods, Inc. $141,288
Cargill, Inc. $98,601
The Clorox Company $12,024
Total $ 7,222,500