Subscribe

Leaked US Document Shows Case for Drone Strikes on Americans

By Jack Phillips
Epoch Times Staff
Created: February 5, 2013 Last Updated: February 12, 2013
Related articles: United States » National News
Print E-mail to a friend Give feedback

Liutenant David Mc Curdy of the Baker Comapny 2-12 infantry of the U.S. Army prepares to launch a Puma Dorin airplane at the Forward Operating Base Joyce in the Kunar province on Aug. 20, 2012. (Jose Cabezas/AFP/GettyImages)

Liutenant David Mc Curdy of the Baker Comapny 2-12 infantry of the U.S. Army prepares to launch a Puma Dorin airplane at the Forward Operating Base Joyce in the Kunar province on Aug. 20, 2012. (Jose Cabezas/AFP/GettyImages)

A memo that was leaked from the U.S. Department of Justice shows the legal basis for using drone strikes to kill American citizens if they are leaders of al-Qaeda or affiliated groups.

The strikes can be ordered even if there is no intelligence that the Americans associated with the terrorist network are actively plotting to attack the U.S., said the memo, which was obtained by NBC News on Tuesday.

“Targeting a member of an enemy force who poses an imminent threat of violent attack to the United States is not unlawful,” it reads. “It is a lawful act of self-defense,” giving reason for lethal force against an individual if they cannot be captured. 

NBC reports that the memo went one step beyond what Attorney General Eric Holder detailed in a speech about drone strikes last year, saying that if the individual’s capture poses an “undue risk” for U.S. personnel, then officials could order a drone strike. It also said that the killing must be carried out under the law of war principles.

“The condition that an operational leader present an ‘imminent’ threat of violent attack against the United States does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future,” the leaked memo said.

The memo says that such individuals pose an “extraordinary” threat to the U.S. in terms of the potential loss of life if they are successful in their operations, but notes that “this conclusion is reached with recognition of the extraordinary seriousness of a lethal operation by the United States against a U.S. citizen.”

Under President Barack Obama, there has been a sharp increase in drone strikes—particularly in Pakistan.

The memo was given to members of the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary committees last summer, reported NBC.

It also elaborates on the use of drones outside recognized war zones. The document states that sovereignty is not violated if a host nation gives consent or if that nation is unwilling or unable to deal with the threat posed by members of the terrorist network.

Jameel Jaffer with the American Civil Liberties Union described the memo as a “chilling” document.

“The white paper purports to recognize some limits on the authority it sets out, but the limits are so vague and elastic that they will be easily manipulated,” he said in a statement.

He added: “It takes as a given that the target of the strike will be a ‘senior operational leader of al-Qa’ida or an associated force of al-Qaeda,’ and it reasons from that premise that judicial process is unnecessary. This is a little bit like assuming that the defendant is guilty and then asking whether it’s useful to have a trial.”

The Epoch Times publishes in 35 countries and in 21 languages. Subscribe to our e-newsletter.



  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=647992960 Larry Pines

    But just WHO makes the determination whether a particular American is a ‘terrorist suspect’? I saw a retired US ARMY officer, interviewed on TV, who was denied entry into Canada because she her name was on a list of ‘persons of interest’ (issued by US authorities to the Canadian RCMP) – or some such bureaucratic label for people of higher moral caliber than those in command – because she spoke out in opposition to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. (see – http://www.democracynow.org/2007/10/5/american_peace_activists_denied_entry_to )

    Might that ‘legal justification’ for tailing HER with a Predator/Reaper Drone (UAV) and ‘taking her out’ with a Hellfire missile regardless of how many ‘non-combatants’ she may be in the company of (at a downtown bus-stop, train station, open air market, etc) ah-la ‘Eagle Eye’?

    It’s patently clear, to anyone who has experience in US DOD contracting, both wars (and civilian UAV proliferation) are little more than ‘cash cows’ for the arms industry, the corporate media, bankers, elected and party officials – all of whom pocket taxpayers’ money in ‘over-charges’ and kick-backs (termed ‘Payola’ in the 1950s) on those (‘no bid’ and ‘selective bid’) contracts.

    President Clinton was wrong, in his State of the Union address. The USA IS following the path of the Roman Empire – unbridled greed, arrogance and corruption in it’s patrician class and most who ‘deal’ with them at the expense of OUR ‘legions’ whilst the ‘plebeians’ blissfully while away their lives in drink, ‘bread and circuses’.

    Wait! What’s that?- sounds like a plane!


GET THE FREE DAILY E-NEWSLETTER


Selected Topics from The Epoch Times

Hong Kong