Low-Carb Diet Outperforms Low-Fat Diet

By Dr. John Briffa Created: July 28, 2008 Last Updated: October 23, 2008
Related articles: Health » Nutrition
Print E-mail to a friend Give feedback

Why is this Mediterranean diet not a low-carb diet?  (David Silverman/Getty Images)

Why is this Mediterranean diet not a low-carb diet? (David Silverman/Getty Images)

It’s perhaps one of the most contentious issues in nutrition: Should individuals who want to control their weight eat a diet low in fat, or low in carbohydrate? The “conventional” view is that fat is “calorific” and fattening, so low-fat is the way to go.

However, some (for example, Gary Taubes and the late Dr. Robert Atkins) have argued that it’s carbohydrate that makes us fat, so we should be reigning in our consumption of such foods. One way to settle this argument is to study the effects of these diets on weight loss, and this week saw the publication of a study in which a low-fat diet was pitted against a low-carb diet over a period of two years.

This study also assessed the effects of a so-called “Mediterranean diet” too.

Participants eating the low-fat and Mediterranean diets were asked to restrict calories (1,500 and 1,800 calories per day for women and men, respectively). Individuals on the low-carb diet could eat as much as they liked.

Of the 322 individuals enrolled in the study, 272 completed it. Of those who completed the study, the average weight losses were:

Low-fat diet group: 7.3 lbs.
Mediterranean diet group: 10.1 lbs.
Low-carb diet group: 12.1 lbs.

The participants of the study also had certain blood parameters checked, including blood fat levels. In medicine, the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol is believed to be a marker for the risk of cardiovascular disease: The higher the ratio, the greater the risk.

Individuals on the low-carb diet saw a reduction in this ratio, which exceeded that achieved on the low-fat diet. Compared to the low-fat group, the low-carb group also saw a statistically significant drop in their levels of unhealthy blood fats known as triglycerides.

In short, compared to the low-fat group, the low-carb group lost more weight and saw improved changes in their blood fat levels.

At the start of the study, 36 participants had been diagnosed with diabetes. These (as well as other) participants had their fasting blood sugar levels checked as part of the study. Compared to the diabetics eating a low-fat diet, those eating a Mediterranean diet experienced a statistically significant reduction in their blood glucose levels, but the low-carb group did not. I find this result somewhat surprising, since there is quite a lot of evidence now that shows carbohydrate restriction can be effective for helping to control blood sugar levels in diabetes.

However, it is perhaps worth pointing out that at the start of the study, more than three-quarters of the diabetics in the low-carb group were on medication for their diabetes, compared to 50 and 47 percent of diabetics in the low-fat and Mediterranean diet groups, respectively. In other words, it is possible that, overall, the diabetics in the low-carb group had more advanced disease which may not have been so amenable to a nutritional approach.

This study adds to the body of evidence that suggests that lower carb and carb-controlled eating has distinct merit and generally has the capacity to out-perform low-fat diets in the weight-loss stakes (and without any conscious restriction of food intake, either). The results of this study suggest that such a diet may be superior in terms of cardiovascular disease risk too.

Shai I, et al. Weight Loss with a Low-Carbohydrate, Mediterranean, or Low-Fat Diet. New England Journal of Medicine 2008; 359:229-241

Dr. John Briffa is a London-based doctor and author with an interest in nutrition and natural medicine.
Dr. Briffa's Web site


Selected Topics from The Epoch Times

ET Videos