Subscribe

Codex Alimentarius

By Scott Tips
National Health Federation
Created: May 24, 2010 Last Updated: April 4, 2011
Related articles: Health » Nutrition
Print E-mail to a friend Give feedback

If Codex has its way, obtaining vitamins in non-approved strength without a prescription will be illegal. (Louise McCoy/The Epoch Times)

If Codex has its way, obtaining vitamins in non-approved strength without a prescription will be illegal. (Louise McCoy/The Epoch Times)

The Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), based in Rome, Italy, is an international organization jointly created by the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) of the United Nations.

The Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Use (CCNFSDU) is responsible for dietary supplements and medical foods and is one of some 27 separate Codex committees. The CCNFSDU meets once yearly in Berlin, Germany (its host country).

The National Health Federation (NHF) is a Codex-recognized organization with the right to attend and speak at these meetings. In fact, it is the only health-freedom organization with this right.

The purpose of Codex is to provide a forum to facilitate global trade in foods and promote consumer food safety by developing science-based standards and guidelines for use by member countries.

Codex guidelines and standards are automatically implemented by the General Agreement on Trade & Tariffs (GATT) of the WHO and become binding for all international trade among GATT signatory countries.

The CAC process calls for proposed committee standards and guidelines to be forwarded and approved by the Codex Alimentarius Commission’s Executive Committee. When the proposals reach final approval (after an eight-step process), they then become binding on all GATT signatories, including the United States.

Thereafter, no GATT-signatory country may use as a trade barrier any standard or guideline that disagrees with a Codex guideline or standard. According to some, it does not mean that all GATT countries must adopt Codex standards for their own domestic use.

According to the NHF, Codex guidelines and standards will inevitably supersede domestic laws, including the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994.

Some organizations, such as the National Health Federation, support Codex guidelines and standards that are based on a free-market approach that maximizes freedom and health. In a free-market approach, the consumer is king and can choose to purchase and consume any foods and dietary supplements that he or she wishes.

History has shown that the safest food products do not come from a top-down, controlled-market economy where a select few decide what is “best” for all of us.

Rather, the safest and healthiest individuals are those who are free to choose for themselves what is best for their health. The goal is to minimize health errors and disease, and a free-market system inevitably leads to such minimization.

Recent history has shown centralized, planned economies to be among the unhealthiest for their citizens. And the more that free-market economies themselves are seduced into allowing health care decisions to be made by elitist planners, the more health and health freedom will suffer.

Therefore, organizations such as the NHF support a decentralized system of health choices. The most decentralized system is one in which each individual consumer is free to choose what to put into his or her own body.

In the case of Codex, the NHF and other health-freedom organizations oppose the current Codex member states that wrongly believe that consumer health will be enhanced by:

·      Denying that dietary supplements can benefit normal, healthy people.

·      Incorrectly defining dietary supplements as only those vitamins and minerals that the body cannot manufacture itself.

·      Restricting the upper-limit amounts of vitamins and minerals, particularly by referring to currently crude and archaic medical beliefs about nutrients.

·      Restricting any physiological-benefit information for consumers.

·      Restricting the lower-limit amounts of vitamins and minerals that may be consumed by individuals.

·      Creating “positive” and “negative” lists of dietary supplements.

The current direction of Codex, they say, is off course and is unfortunately driven by a statist and elitist mentality that presumes to know what is best for consumer health and protection. Unfortunately, such a mindset comes from the 1930’s, 1940’s, and 1950’s “brave new world” kind of thinking that elevated central planners into a form of “God on Earth.”

That kind of outdated thinking has caused more misery, death, and disease than can possibly be imagined.

That is why many support a Codex process that would free up health knowledge and products for the entire world. A free-market system of choice and knowledge would avoid the errors of central planning that sets standards, however well-intentioned, into stone.

With the doubling time of knowledge constantly accelerating, mankind cannot afford the “luxury” of getting stuck in health standards established in the 20th century while new health knowledge and products are discovered almost daily. We also wish that such discoveries continue.

The best way to ensure such progress and advancing health is to keep the planners and bureaucrats from straitjacketing health and health advances with medieval thinking and restrictions.

Scott Tips is the president and legal counsel for the National Health Federation, TheNHF.com




GET THE FREE DAILY E-NEWSLETTER


Selected Topics from The Epoch Times

James Goodlatte