Subscribe

Calorie Labeling in Restaurants: A Thoroughly Bad Idea

By Dr. John Briffa Created: November 10, 2011 Last Updated: November 13, 2011
Related articles: Health » Nutrition
Print E-mail to a friend Give feedback

March 24, 2010 in New York City. Health care legislation requires every large restaurant chain in the country to provide caloric data on their menus. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

March 24, 2010 in New York City. Health care legislation requires every large restaurant chain in the country to provide caloric data on their menus. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

I have a friend who until recently managed a hotel in the west of England. The restaurant at the hotel is Michelin-starred. My friend talked with me some months ago about calls for restaurants to post the calorie-counts of meals on the menu.

He’s not keen on the idea, telling me (I paraphrase): People don’t eat in Michelin-starred restaurants to count calories.

He’s right, of course, but there are other reasons why this practice, all the rage now in New York, is unlikely to do much good. Paradoxically, there is some evidence that it might actually cause harm.

The issues regarding calorie posting in restaurants and fast food joints was well-discussed in an article that appeared online on Feb. 23 in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. The article describes how the introduction of calorie posting in New York was preceded by a study that found that individuals who noticed the calorie counts of food at Subway ate about 50 calories less than those who had not noticed the calorie postings.

But, as the article points out, this does not necessarily mean that posting calories leads to lower consumption. It might be, for example, that “calorie-conscious” people looked for calorie counts and were going to choose lower calorie options anyway.

Making calorie posting compulsory in New York has allowed many more studies to be done on the effect of this practice. The result? Most studies show no effect, and when calorie intakes have fallen, the effect has generally been “miniscule.”

More worrying yet, is the fact that some studies have found that posting calorie counts has led to an increase in consumption. In one study published in the American Economic Review in May 2009, for instance, labeling led to an increase in calorie consumption in those reporting that they were on a diet!

The author of the piece in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition speculates on how posting calorie contents of food might actually increase caloric intake. For example, some individual might over-estimate the calorie contents of foods. Knowing the real (and lower) calorie content might therefore cause the person to eat more.

Also, some individuals may see similarly priced but higher-calorie options as providing better value for the money.

The author draws our attention to the fact that obsessiveness regarding calories might add to the tendency for some to exhibit “irrational, even neurotic, patterns of [eating] behavior.” “Calorie labeling can potentially amplify such neuroticism, converting eating from a necessary and pleasurable activity to one fraught with anxiety and internal conflict.”

Calorie labeling is a huge retrograde step in that it puts the emphasis on the calorie count of food rather than its quality.

To my mind, though, calorie labeling is a huge retrograde step in that it puts the emphasis on the calorie count of food rather than its quality. It reinforces the ideas that all calories have the same weight and health effects in the body (they don’t), and that something low in calories is somehow inherently better than something higher in calories.

One disastrous consequence of this obsession with calories has been a general eschewing of fat in favor of carbohydrates. But carbohydrates drive insulin secretion, which, among other things, drives deposition of fat in the fat cells.

By promoting inflammation and perhaps other mechanisms, carbohydrates can also disrupt the function of the hormone leptin, leading to suppression of the metabolism and heightened hunger.

Carbohydrate-rich foods are not especially satisfying either, particularly if they lead to drops in blood sugar some time later (which they often do). Drops in blood sugar can induce “false” hunger and a craving for sweet or starchy foods.

The focus on calories is, if anything, counter-productive for weight control. It’s clearly not part of the solution to the obesity epidemic, despite what some policy-makers like to think.

Dr. John Briffa is a London-based physician and author with an interest in nutrition and natural medicine. His website is DrBriffa.com.





Selected Topics from The Epoch Times

Chinese Regime in Crisis